Touching, Tinkering, and Manipulating: Bodily Engagement When Reading for Academic Purposes and Why It Matters.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Touching, Tinkering, and Manipulating: Bodily Engagement When Reading for Academic Purposes and Why It Matters.
Authors: Støyva, Marte Pupe1 (AUTHOR) marte.p.stoyva@uis.no, Mangen, Anne1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Reading Research Quarterly (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). Apr2026 Supplement 1, Vol. 61, p1-16. 16p.
Subject Terms: *Reading, *Graduate students, *Cognitive psychology, *Reading materials, Sensorimotor integration
Abstract: Reading for academic purposes in higher education is a complex activity involving the use of various text types and formats, and readers interact with different objects such as laptops, tablets, paper formats, and writing tools. Such interactions entail embodied engagement: readers engage their bodies, especially their hands and fingers, to touch the reading surface, turn the page or scroll, tinker with a pen, and manipulate the texts. Yet, little attention has been given to the role of the reader's body during reading. This study suggests that bodily activities contribute to the ongoing reading processes, and the study asks: how do embodied, hands‐on engagement with objects—through touch, tinkering, and manipulation—shape real‐time, situated reading practices? We draw on data from a larger qualitative study to analyze embodied engagement during graduate students' naturalistic reading activities. Extensive video data is used to describe the readers' bodily enactment of ongoing reading processes, and we demonstrate and discuss how the interaction between reader and objects is shaped by the affordances in the physical objects. The analysis reveals how potential bodily activities vary because objects afford different ways of engaging with them. We conclude that graduate students' reading for academic purposes is an activity where the body plays a key role, and that embodied engagement with objects can both benefit and restrain students' reading. Integrating embodied and distributed perspectives on cognition with reading research can strengthen our understanding of naturalistic reading activities, and embodied engagement should be acknowledged as an important factor in reading. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Reading Research Quarterly (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Reading for academic purposes in higher education is a complex activity involving the use of various text types and formats, and readers interact with different objects such as laptops, tablets, paper formats, and writing tools. Such interactions entail embodied engagement: readers engage their bodies, especially their hands and fingers, to touch the reading surface, turn the page or scroll, tinker with a pen, and manipulate the texts. Yet, little attention has been given to the role of the reader's body during reading. This study suggests that bodily activities contribute to the ongoing reading processes, and the study asks: how do embodied, hands‐on engagement with objects—through touch, tinkering, and manipulation—shape real‐time, situated reading practices? We draw on data from a larger qualitative study to analyze embodied engagement during graduate students' naturalistic reading activities. Extensive video data is used to describe the readers' bodily enactment of ongoing reading processes, and we demonstrate and discuss how the interaction between reader and objects is shaped by the affordances in the physical objects. The analysis reveals how potential bodily activities vary because objects afford different ways of engaging with them. We conclude that graduate students' reading for academic purposes is an activity where the body plays a key role, and that embodied engagement with objects can both benefit and restrain students' reading. Integrating embodied and distributed perspectives on cognition with reading research can strengthen our understanding of naturalistic reading activities, and embodied engagement should be acknowledged as an important factor in reading. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:19362722
DOI:10.1002/rrq.70088