Connecticut.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Connecticut.
Authors: Desaulniers, Alexandra1 (AUTHOR) adesaulniers@floridapoly.edu, Willman, Michael1 (AUTHOR), Antonuccio-Amato, Isabella1 (AUTHOR), Dewey, James1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Education Human Resources. Apr2026 Supplement 1, Vol. 44 Issue S1, p29-33. 5p.
Subject Terms: *Educational finance, *Charter schools, *Special education, *Secondary education, *Higher education, Fiscal year, Administrative efficiency
Geographic Terms: Connecticut
Abstract: Connecticut's fiscal year (FY) 2025 education maintains investment in both K–12 and higher education despite ongoing fiscal constraints. Base funding for K–12 and special education is largely unchanged, with additional resources directed toward high-need districts and charter schools. Special education funding continues to rely on the Excess Cost Grant and its tiered reimbursement structure, while charter school funding remains consistent with prior levels. Higher education appropriations show only minor adjustments, alongside continued efforts to improve administrative efficiency through centralized human resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Education Human Resources is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Connecticut's fiscal year (FY) 2025 education maintains investment in both K–12 and higher education despite ongoing fiscal constraints. Base funding for K–12 and special education is largely unchanged, with additional resources directed toward high-need districts and charter schools. Special education funding continues to rely on the Excess Cost Grant and its tiered reimbursement structure, while charter school funding remains consistent with prior levels. Higher education appropriations show only minor adjustments, alongside continued efforts to improve administrative efficiency through centralized human resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:2562783X
DOI:10.3138/jehr-2025-0080