Leveraging a Critical Quantitative Perspective and the MIMIC Approach to Produce More Equitable Measures in Vocational Psychology.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Leveraging a Critical Quantitative Perspective and the MIMIC Approach to Produce More Equitable Measures in Vocational Psychology.
Authors: Diemer, Matthew A.1 (AUTHOR) diemerm@umich.edu, Bui, Ha1 (AUTHOR), Holland, Nia D.1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Career Assessment. Aug2026, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p615-633. 19p.
Subject Terms: *Item response theory, *Occupational training, Social justice, Classism, Work values, Quantitative research, Units of measurement, Structural equation modeling
Abstract: This article positions Critical Quantitative methodology (CritQuant) as a justice-oriented framework for conducting quantitative research in vocational psychology that interrogates power, centers context, and resists the reproduction of structural inequities - aligning with historical and contemporary social justice currents within the discipline. To illustrate specific applications of CritQuant within vocational psychology, an empirical example applies Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) modeling to Youth Development Study (YDS) data to examine differential item functioning in a measure of intrinsic work values across subjective social class groups. This model indicates systematic differential item functioning, or DIF, in two YDS items. This illustrates how vocational psychologists could leverage a CritQuant perspective and the MIMIC approach to identify biased items, which could subsequently be removed or modified to ensure vocational measures less contaminated by class bias (in this example), along with other systems of oppression (more broadly). In sum, this article aims to illustrate how vocational psychologists can leverage quantitative approaches to attain more equitable measures, and thus produce more equitable scholarship, practice implications, and policy recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Career Assessment is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:This article positions Critical Quantitative methodology (CritQuant) as a justice-oriented framework for conducting quantitative research in vocational psychology that interrogates power, centers context, and resists the reproduction of structural inequities - aligning with historical and contemporary social justice currents within the discipline. To illustrate specific applications of CritQuant within vocational psychology, an empirical example applies Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) modeling to Youth Development Study (YDS) data to examine differential item functioning in a measure of intrinsic work values across subjective social class groups. This model indicates systematic differential item functioning, or DIF, in two YDS items. This illustrates how vocational psychologists could leverage a CritQuant perspective and the MIMIC approach to identify biased items, which could subsequently be removed or modified to ensure vocational measures less contaminated by class bias (in this example), along with other systems of oppression (more broadly). In sum, this article aims to illustrate how vocational psychologists can leverage quantitative approaches to attain more equitable measures, and thus produce more equitable scholarship, practice implications, and policy recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10690727
DOI:10.1177/10690727261437111