Prinzipien der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit: Gerechtigkeitsprinzipien in politischen Debatten sowie aktuelle Befunde aus der empirischen Gerechtigkeitsforschung.
Saved in:
| Title: | Prinzipien der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit: Gerechtigkeitsprinzipien in politischen Debatten sowie aktuelle Befunde aus der empirischen Gerechtigkeitsforschung. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Lütkewitte, Simon1, Kroh, Martin2 |
| Source: | Gesellschaft Wirtschaft Politik (GWP). 2026, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p189-199. 11p. |
| Subject Terms: | Distributive justice, Political debates, Equality, Need (Psychology), Income, Consensus (Social sciences) |
| Geographic Terms: | Germany |
| Abstract (English): | The scholarly article deals with the principles of distributive justice and their significance in political debates as well as current findings from empirical justice research. Four central principles of justice are presented: the principle of performance (reward according to effort), the principle of equality (equal distribution), the principle of need (distribution according to needs), and the principle of entitlement (claims based on ascriptive characteristics such as origin). Empirical findings show that in Germany there is a broad societal consensus in favor of the performance and need principles, while the entitlement principle is predominantly rejected, although it is perceived as being relatively strongly enforced. Differences in support for the principles between income groups and party supporters are small, indicating a broad agreement within the population. [Extracted from the article] |
| Abstract (German): | Menschen bewerten eine bestehende Verteilung von Ressourcen (z.B. Einkommen) in der Gesellschaft sehr unterschiedlich und vielfach im Einklang mi ihren Grundvorstellungen von Gerechtigkeit. Der Beitrag stellt vier Prinzipien vor, die helfen, Verteilungen als gerecht oder ungerecht einzuordnen: das Leistungs-, Gleichheits-, Bedarfs- und das Anrechtsprinzip. Obwohl in sozialpolitischen Debatten deutliche Parteienunterschiede in der Fokussierung der Prinzipien ersichtlich werden, zeigen unsere Befunde einen breiten Konsens in der Bevölkerung zu Leistungs- und Bedarfsprinzip sowie zur Abkehr vom Anrechtsprinzip. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Gesellschaft Wirtschaft Politik (GWP) is the property of Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 194630492 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Prinzipien der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit: Gerechtigkeitsprinzipien in politischen Debatten sowie aktuelle Befunde aus der empirischen Gerechtigkeitsforschung. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lütkewitte%2C+Simon%22">Lütkewitte, Simon</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kroh%2C+Martin%22">Kroh, Martin</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Gesellschaft+Wirtschaft+Politik+%28GWP%29%22">Gesellschaft Wirtschaft Politik (GWP)</searchLink>. 2026, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p189-199. 11p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distributive+justice%22">Distributive justice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+debates%22">Political debates</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equality%22">Equality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Need+%28Psychology%29%22">Need (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Income%22">Income</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consensus+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Consensus (Social sciences)</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (English) Group: Ab Data: The scholarly article deals with the principles of distributive justice and their significance in political debates as well as current findings from empirical justice research. Four central principles of justice are presented: the principle of performance (reward according to effort), the principle of equality (equal distribution), the principle of need (distribution according to needs), and the principle of entitlement (claims based on ascriptive characteristics such as origin). Empirical findings show that in Germany there is a broad societal consensus in favor of the performance and need principles, while the entitlement principle is predominantly rejected, although it is perceived as being relatively strongly enforced. Differences in support for the principles between income groups and party supporters are small, indicating a broad agreement within the population. [Extracted from the article] – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (German) Group: Ab Data: Menschen bewerten eine bestehende Verteilung von Ressourcen (z.B. Einkommen) in der Gesellschaft sehr unterschiedlich und vielfach im Einklang mi ihren Grundvorstellungen von Gerechtigkeit. Der Beitrag stellt vier Prinzipien vor, die helfen, Verteilungen als gerecht oder ungerecht einzuordnen: das Leistungs-, Gleichheits-, Bedarfs- und das Anrechtsprinzip. Obwohl in sozialpolitischen Debatten deutliche Parteienunterschiede in der Fokussierung der Prinzipien ersichtlich werden, zeigen unsere Befunde einen breiten Konsens in der Bevölkerung zu Leistungs- und Bedarfsprinzip sowie zur Abkehr vom Anrechtsprinzip. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Gesellschaft Wirtschaft Politik (GWP) is the property of Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=194630492 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.3224/gwp.v75i2.08 Languages: – Code: ger Text: German PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 189 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Distributive justice Type: general – SubjectFull: Political debates Type: general – SubjectFull: Equality Type: general – SubjectFull: Need (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Income Type: general – SubjectFull: Consensus (Social sciences) Type: general – SubjectFull: Germany Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Prinzipien der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit: Gerechtigkeitsprinzipien in politischen Debatten sowie aktuelle Befunde aus der empirischen Gerechtigkeitsforschung. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lütkewitte, Simon – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kroh, Martin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: 2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 16196910 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 75 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Gesellschaft Wirtschaft Politik (GWP) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
