View in EDS

Student-negotiated syllabi boost EFL learner willingness to communicate and academic passion versus teacher-designed syllabi.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Student-negotiated syllabi boost EFL learner willingness to communicate and academic passion versus teacher-designed syllabi.
Authors: Alibakhshi, Goudarz1 (AUTHOR) alibakhshi@atu.ac.ir, Javaheri, Reza2 (AUTHOR) r.javaheri@mail.utoronto.ca, Akhter, Shamim3 (AUTHOR) shamim.akhter@newinti.edu.my
Source: Discover Education. 6/5/2026, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p.
Subject Terms: *Curriculum planning, *Student engagement
Abstract: Collaborative syllabus development between teachers and students has emerged as a promising approach in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction. Understanding how such negotiations impact learners' Willingness to Communicate (WTC) and academic passion is vital for effective pedagogy. This quasi-experimental study examined the effects of teacher-assigned versus student-negotiated syllabi on these two constructs. A total of 200 undergraduate students from six intact classes were randomly assigned at the class level to either an experimental group (student-negotiated syllabus) or a control group (teacher-designed syllabus), ensuring natural classroom conditions while addressing logistical constraints. Participants completed validated measures of WTC and academic passion before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA), controlling for pretest scores. Findings revealed that students exposed to the negotiated syllabus demonstrated significantly greater improvements in both WTC and academic passion compared to those in the control group. These results highlight the role of learner involvement in fostering engagement, motivation, and communicative confidence in EFL settings. The study underscores the pedagogical value of participatory syllabus design and offers implications for learner-centered curriculum development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Discover Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Collaborative syllabus development between teachers and students has emerged as a promising approach in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction. Understanding how such negotiations impact learners' Willingness to Communicate (WTC) and academic passion is vital for effective pedagogy. This quasi-experimental study examined the effects of teacher-assigned versus student-negotiated syllabi on these two constructs. A total of 200 undergraduate students from six intact classes were randomly assigned at the class level to either an experimental group (student-negotiated syllabus) or a control group (teacher-designed syllabus), ensuring natural classroom conditions while addressing logistical constraints. Participants completed validated measures of WTC and academic passion before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA), controlling for pretest scores. Findings revealed that students exposed to the negotiated syllabus demonstrated significantly greater improvements in both WTC and academic passion compared to those in the control group. These results highlight the role of learner involvement in fostering engagement, motivation, and communicative confidence in EFL settings. The study underscores the pedagogical value of participatory syllabus design and offers implications for learner-centered curriculum development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:27315525
DOI:10.1007/s44217-026-01401-4