Development of a Practice Profile to Examine Two Implementation Outcomes in Speech-Language Pathologists' Comprehensive Evaluations: Adoption and Fidelity.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Development of a Practice Profile to Examine Two Implementation Outcomes in Speech-Language Pathologists' Comprehensive Evaluations: Adoption and Fidelity.
Authors:	Heilmann, John¹ heilmanj@uwm.edu, Wojtyna, Alyssa¹, Merth-Johnson, Dawn², Bizub, Jessica³, Chase, Joseph⁴
Source:	Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools. Jul2026, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p807-826. 20p.
Subject Terms:	Data analysis, Speech-language pathology, *Research methodology, Research funding, Research evaluation, Descriptive statistics, Statistics, Quality assurance
Geographic Terms:	Wisconsin
Abstract:	Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a practice profile to document speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') fidelity in comprehensive evaluation practices. The study tested the internal consistency of practice profile items, differences in fidelity scores across assessment methods, and discrepancies between fidelity and adoption measures. Method: The study involved 212 SLPs from six Wisconsin school districts participating in the Wisconsin Collective for Comprehensive Assessment implementation project. Participants completed self-ratings of their adoption and fidelity with eight assessment tasks. Results: The practice profile demonstrated strong internal consistency, with Duhachek's alpha values exceeding 0.70 for most sets of items. Significant differences in fidelity scores were observed across assessment methods, with the following hierarchy: stimulability > norm-referenced = observation > academic standards > language sample analysis = dynamic assessment. Adoption scores were significantly higher than fidelity scores for five of the six assessment tasks, indicating a gap between intended and actual practices. Conclusions: The findings suggest the need for targeted training and development of tools to support high-fidelity implementation of assessment tasks, particularly for academic standards, language sample analysis, and dynamic assessment. Further research should explore how adoption and fidelity measures can support implementation efforts to promote best practices in speechlanguage pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a practice profile to document speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') fidelity in comprehensive evaluation practices. The study tested the internal consistency of practice profile items, differences in fidelity scores across assessment methods, and discrepancies between fidelity and adoption measures. Method: The study involved 212 SLPs from six Wisconsin school districts participating in the Wisconsin Collective for Comprehensive Assessment implementation project. Participants completed self-ratings of their adoption and fidelity with eight assessment tasks. Results: The practice profile demonstrated strong internal consistency, with Duhachek's alpha values exceeding 0.70 for most sets of items. Significant differences in fidelity scores were observed across assessment methods, with the following hierarchy: stimulability > norm-referenced = observation > academic standards > language sample analysis = dynamic assessment. Adoption scores were significantly higher than fidelity scores for five of the six assessment tasks, indicating a gap between intended and actual practices. Conclusions: The findings suggest the need for targeted training and development of tools to support high-fidelity implementation of assessment tasks, particularly for academic standards, language sample analysis, and dynamic assessment. Further research should explore how adoption and fidelity measures can support implementation efforts to promote best practices in speechlanguage pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	01611461
DOI:	10.1044/2026_LSHSS-25-00117