View in EDS PDF Full Text

Lived Experiences of Speech-Language Pathology Students With Disabilities in Their Clinical Training.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Lived Experiences of Speech-Language Pathology Students With Disabilities in Their Clinical Training.
Authors: Subramanian, Anu1, Hatfield, Stacie M.2 staciehatfield@augustana.edu, Sizemore, Erin Redle3
Source: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Jul2026, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p1601-1626. 26p.
Subject Terms: *Qualitative research, *Students with disabilities, *College teachers, *Attitudes toward disabilities, *Speech-language pathology assistants, *Research methodology, *Student attitudes, *Clinical education, *Discrimination against people with disabilities, Statistical sampling, Interviewing, Descriptive statistics, Judgment sampling, Thematic analysis, Phenomenology, Data analysis software, Psychosocial factors, Self-disclosure
Abstract: Purpose: There is an increase in the number of students with disabilities who are pursuing speech-language pathology as a degree, but there is limited information regarding their clinical education experiences. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the lived experiences of current and former speechlanguage pathology students with disabilities as they complete their clinical training programs. Method: Thematic analysis was conducted on the transcripts of 20 participants' interviews related to their experiences in clinical training. Meaningful units and themes were gathered from the data by the three researchers following the framework from Braun and Clarke (2022). Following the development of themes, participants were invited to review the themes to indicate whether they captured their experiences as students with disabilities in speech-language pathology. Results: Three themes--the lived experience of disability, the role of faculty, and the impact of systemic factors--were identified from 221 meaningful units related to the research questions. Some of the subthemes that were also noted were as follows: (a) It's hard/student burden, (b) proactive self-advocacy, (c) value of disabled identity, (d) supportive faculty/program, (e) gatekeeping or reexamining what it means to be a speech-language pathologist, and (f) perceived discrimination, among others. Conclusions: Experiences of students with disabilities were varied in their clinical training programs. Positive and negative experiences spanned systemic, programmatic, and individual levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Purpose: There is an increase in the number of students with disabilities who are pursuing speech-language pathology as a degree, but there is limited information regarding their clinical education experiences. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the lived experiences of current and former speechlanguage pathology students with disabilities as they complete their clinical training programs. Method: Thematic analysis was conducted on the transcripts of 20 participants' interviews related to their experiences in clinical training. Meaningful units and themes were gathered from the data by the three researchers following the framework from Braun and Clarke (2022). Following the development of themes, participants were invited to review the themes to indicate whether they captured their experiences as students with disabilities in speech-language pathology. Results: Three themes--the lived experience of disability, the role of faculty, and the impact of systemic factors--were identified from 221 meaningful units related to the research questions. Some of the subthemes that were also noted were as follows: (a) It's hard/student burden, (b) proactive self-advocacy, (c) value of disabled identity, (d) supportive faculty/program, (e) gatekeeping or reexamining what it means to be a speech-language pathologist, and (f) perceived discrimination, among others. Conclusions: Experiences of students with disabilities were varied in their clinical training programs. Positive and negative experiences spanned systemic, programmatic, and individual levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10580360
DOI:10.1044/2026_AJSLP-25-00329