Naming, Not Othering: Reframing Communication Labels in Speech-Language Pathology Practice.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Naming, Not Othering: Reframing Communication Labels in Speech-Language Pathology Practice.
Authors:	Lee-Holloway, Shanna Caprice¹ shannacapricelee@gmail.com
Source:	American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Jul2026, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p1908-1911. 4p.
Subject Terms:	Dialects, Culture, Speech-language pathology, Communication barriers, *Cognition, Professional practice
Abstract:	Purpose: This letter proposes that we, speech-language pathology professionals, should stop labeling languages and skills as "differences" with the implication that they are different from General American English (GAE). Instead, we should refer to specific languages by their proper names (e.g., African American English, GAE, Spanish, and French). This letter also highlights how labels can influence individuals' perceptions of a language's legitimacy. This letter is intended to open a dialogue on an important topic rather than provide a comprehensive review or analysis. Considerations that warrant further attention will be highlighted. Conclusion: Referring to languages and skills by their name is necessary for speech-language pathologists, fostering a culture of cognitive and linguistic acceptance rather than facilitating an "othering" tone when describing skills and characteristics that do not reflect a standard or dominant ideology. Consideration of this proposed philosophical shift is needed for the sake of ethical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Purpose: This letter proposes that we, speech-language pathology professionals, should stop labeling languages and skills as "differences" with the implication that they are different from General American English (GAE). Instead, we should refer to specific languages by their proper names (e.g., African American English, GAE, Spanish, and French). This letter also highlights how labels can influence individuals' perceptions of a language's legitimacy. This letter is intended to open a dialogue on an important topic rather than provide a comprehensive review or analysis. Considerations that warrant further attention will be highlighted. Conclusion: Referring to languages and skills by their name is necessary for speech-language pathologists, fostering a culture of cognitive and linguistic acceptance rather than facilitating an "othering" tone when describing skills and characteristics that do not reflect a standard or dominant ideology. Consideration of this proposed philosophical shift is needed for the sake of ethical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	10580360
DOI:	10.1044/2026_AJSLP-25-00407