Artificial Intelligence in Scholarly Peer Review: Ethical Considerations, Current Practices, and Future Implications.
Saved in:
| Title: | Artificial Intelligence in Scholarly Peer Review: Ethical Considerations, Current Practices, and Future Implications. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Bozkurt, Aras1 |
| Source: | International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning. Aug2026, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p11-30. 20p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Scholarly peer review, *Artificial intelligence, *Scholarly publishing, *Ethical problems, *Algorithmic bias, *Confidential communications, Scientific method, Government accountability |
| Abstract: | The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into scholarly peer review represents a fundamental transformation of academic publishing's quality control mechanisms. This report critically examined the ethical considerations, institutional practices, and emerging technologies associated with AI-assisted peer review. Drawing on recent policy documents from major publishing organizations, empirical research on AI implementation, and critical scholarship on algorithmic bias, this analysis revealed significant tensions between efficiency gains and integrity preservation. While AI tools have demonstrated potential for addressing reviewer burnout and publication delays, their deployment raises critical concerns regarding confidentiality breaches, accountability gaps, algorithmic bias, and the erosion of expert judgment. Major organizations (e.g., International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) and leading publishers such as Elsevier and Taylor & Francis have emphasized disclosure where AI is used, human accountability, and strict confidentiality controls--often prohibiting uploading unpublished manuscripts into generative AI tools. However, empirical evidence has suggested nontrivial, and potentially growing, undisclosed large language model (LLM)-assisted text in peer review in some conference contexts. This report concluded that AI should serve as an augmentative rather than substitutive technology in peer review, with robust governance frameworks, transparent disclosure mechanisms, and continuous evaluation of equity implications essential for responsible implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning is the property of Governors of Athabasca University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
Be the first to leave a comment!
