Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction.
Saved in:
| Title: | Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Sarampalis, Anastasios1 a.sarampalis@rug.nl, Kalluri, Sridhar2, Edwards, Brent2, Hafter, Ervin1 |
| Source: | Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Oct2009, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p1230-1240. 11p. 4 Graphs. |
| Subject Terms: | *Auditory perception testing, *Intelligibility of speech, *Memory testing, Hearing aids, Signal-to-noise ratio, Listening ability testing |
| Abstract: | Purpose: This work is aimed at addressing a seeming contradiction related to the use of noise-reduction (NR) algorithms in hearing aids. The problem is that although some listeners claim a subjective improvement from NR, it has not been shown to improve speech intelligibility, often even making it worse. Method: To address this, the hypothesis tested here is that the positive effects of NR might be to reduce cognitive effort directed toward speech reception, making it available for other tasks. Normal-hearing individuals participated in 2 dual-task experiments, in which 1 task was to report sentences or words in noise set to various signal-to-noise ratios. Secondary tasks involved either holding words in short-term memory or responding in a complex visual reaction-time task. Results: At low values of signal-to-noise ratio, although NR had no positive effect on speech reception thresholds, it led to better performance on the word-memory task and quicker responses in visual reaction times. Conclusions: Results from both dual tasks support the hypothesis that NR reduces listening effort and frees up cognitive resources for other tasks. Future hearing aid research should incorporate objective measurements of cognitive benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 45108144 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sarampalis%2C+Anastasios%22">Sarampalis, Anastasios</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> a.sarampalis@rug.nl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kalluri%2C+Sridhar%22">Kalluri, Sridhar</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Edwards%2C+Brent%22">Edwards, Brent</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hafter%2C+Ervin%22">Hafter, Ervin</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Speech%2C+Language+%26+Hearing+Research%22">Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research</searchLink>. Oct2009, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p1230-1240. 11p. 4 Graphs. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Auditory+perception+testing%22">Auditory perception testing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intelligibility+of+speech%22">Intelligibility of speech</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memory+testing%22">Memory testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+aids%22">Hearing aids</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Signal-to-noise+ratio%22">Signal-to-noise ratio</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Listening+ability+testing%22">Listening ability testing</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: This work is aimed at addressing a seeming contradiction related to the use of noise-reduction (NR) algorithms in hearing aids. The problem is that although some listeners claim a subjective improvement from NR, it has not been shown to improve speech intelligibility, often even making it worse. Method: To address this, the hypothesis tested here is that the positive effects of NR might be to reduce cognitive effort directed toward speech reception, making it available for other tasks. Normal-hearing individuals participated in 2 dual-task experiments, in which 1 task was to report sentences or words in noise set to various signal-to-noise ratios. Secondary tasks involved either holding words in short-term memory or responding in a complex visual reaction-time task. Results: At low values of signal-to-noise ratio, although NR had no positive effect on speech reception thresholds, it led to better performance on the word-memory task and quicker responses in visual reaction times. Conclusions: Results from both dual tasks support the hypothesis that NR reduces listening effort and frees up cognitive resources for other tasks. Future hearing aid research should incorporate objective measurements of cognitive benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=45108144 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0111) Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 1230 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Auditory perception testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Intelligibility of speech Type: general – SubjectFull: Memory testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Hearing aids Type: general – SubjectFull: Signal-to-noise ratio Type: general – SubjectFull: Listening ability testing Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sarampalis, Anastasios – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kalluri, Sridhar – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Edwards, Brent – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hafter, Ervin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: Oct2009 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10924388 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 52 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
