Research Ethics I: Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)--Historical and Contemporary Issues Pertaining to Human and Animal Experimentation.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Research Ethics I: Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)--Historical and Contemporary Issues Pertaining to Human and Animal Experimentation.
Authors:	Horner, Jennifer¹ hornerj@ohio.edu, Minifie, Fred D.²
Source:	Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Feb2011, Vol. 54 Issue 1, pS303-S329. 27p. 4 Charts.
Subject Terms:	*History of research, Animal experimentation & ethics, Medical research laws, Government agencies, Medical research, Research ethics, Responsibility, Social values, Standards
Geographic Terms:	United States
Abstract:	Purpose: In this series of articles—Research Ethics I, Research Ethics II, and Research Ethics III—the authors provide a comprehensive review of the 9 core domains for the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as articulated by the Office of Research Integrity. In Research Ethics I, they present a historical overview of the evolution of RCR in the United States then examine the evolution of human and animal experimentation from the birth of scientific medicine through World War II to the present day. Method: They relied on authoritative documents, both historical and contemporary, insightful commentary, and empirical research in order to identify current issues and controversies of potential interest to both faculty and students. Conclusions: The authors have written this article from a historical perspective because they think all readers interested in RCR should appreciate how the history of science and all the good—and harm—it has produced can inform how researchers practice responsible research in the 21st century and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Purpose: In this series of articles—Research Ethics I, Research Ethics II, and Research Ethics III—the authors provide a comprehensive review of the 9 core domains for the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as articulated by the Office of Research Integrity. In Research Ethics I, they present a historical overview of the evolution of RCR in the United States then examine the evolution of human and animal experimentation from the birth of scientific medicine through World War II to the present day. Method: They relied on authoritative documents, both historical and contemporary, insightful commentary, and empirical research in order to identify current issues and controversies of potential interest to both faculty and students. Conclusions: The authors have written this article from a historical perspective because they think all readers interested in RCR should appreciate how the history of science and all the good—and harm—it has produced can inform how researchers practice responsible research in the 21st century and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	10924388
DOI:	10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0265)