Assessing the Practical Equivalence of Conversions When Measurement Conditions Change.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Assessing the Practical Equivalence of Conversions When Measurement Conditions Change.
Authors:	Liu, Jinghua¹, Dorans, Neil J.¹
Source:	Journal of Educational Measurement. Mar2012, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p101-115. 15p. 9 Charts, 4 Graphs.
Subject Terms:	Educational tests & measurements, Psychological tests, *Test scoring, Psychometrics, Conversion disorder
Abstract:	At times, the same set of test questions is administered under different measurement conditions that might affect the psychometric properties of the test scores enough to warrant different score conversions for the different conditions. We propose a procedure for assessing the practical equivalence of conversions developed for the same set of test questions but administered under different measurement conditions. This procedure assesses whether the use of separate conversions for each condition has a desirable or undesirable effect. We distinguish effects due to differences in difficulty from effects due to rounding conventions. The proposed procedure provides objective empirical information that assists in deciding to report a common conversion for a set of items or a different conversion for the set of items when the set is administered under different measurement conditions. To illustrate the use of the procedure, we consider the case where a scrambled test form is used along with a base test form. If section order effects are detected between the scrambled and base forms, a decision needs to be made whether to report a single common conversion for both forms or to report separate conversions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Journal of Educational Measurement is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	At times, the same set of test questions is administered under different measurement conditions that might affect the psychometric properties of the test scores enough to warrant different score conversions for the different conditions. We propose a procedure for assessing the practical equivalence of conversions developed for the same set of test questions but administered under different measurement conditions. This procedure assesses whether the use of separate conversions for each condition has a desirable or undesirable effect. We distinguish effects due to differences in difficulty from effects due to rounding conventions. The proposed procedure provides objective empirical information that assists in deciding to report a common conversion for a set of items or a different conversion for the set of items when the set is administered under different measurement conditions. To illustrate the use of the procedure, we consider the case where a scrambled test form is used along with a base test form. If section order effects are detected between the scrambled and base forms, a decision needs to be made whether to report a single common conversion for both forms or to report separate conversions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	00220655
DOI:	10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00162.x