The Role of Experience in the Perception of Phonetic Detail in Children's Speech: A Comparison Between Speech-Language Pathologists and Clinically Untrained Listeners.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Role of Experience in the Perception of Phonetic Detail in Children's Speech: A Comparison Between Speech-Language Pathologists and Clinically Untrained Listeners.
Authors: Munson, Benjamin1 Munso005@umn.edu, Johnson, Julie M.1, Edwards, Jan2
Source: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. May2012, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p124-139. 16p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 3 Graphs.
Subject Terms: *Comparative studies, *Statistical correlation, *Employees, *Experience, *Experimental design, *Self-evaluation, *Speech evaluation, *Speech perception, *Speech therapists, *Data analysis, *Undergraduates, Analysis of variance, Phonetics, Questionnaires, Research evaluation, Statistics, T-test (Statistics), U-statistics, Visual analog scale, Descriptive statistics
Geographic Terms: Minnesota
Abstract: Purpose: This study examined whether experienced speech-language pathologists (SLPs) differ from inexperienced people in their perception of phonetic detail in children's speech. Method: Twenty-one experienced SLPs and 21 inexperienced listeners participated in a series of tasks in which they used a visual-analog scale (VAS) to rate children's natural productions of target /s/θ/q/, /t /-/k /, and /d /-/G/ in word-initial position. Listeners rated the perceived distance between individual productions and ideal productions. Results: The experienced listeners' ratings differed from the inexperienced listeners' ratings in four ways: They had higher intrarater reliability, showed less bias toward a more frequent sound, and were more closely related to the acoustic characteristics of the children's speech. In addition, the experienced listeners' responses were related to a different set of predictor variables. Conclusion: Results suggest that experience working as an SLP leads to better perception of phonetic detail in children's speech. Limitations and future research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Purpose: This study examined whether experienced speech-language pathologists (SLPs) differ from inexperienced people in their perception of phonetic detail in children's speech. Method: Twenty-one experienced SLPs and 21 inexperienced listeners participated in a series of tasks in which they used a visual-analog scale (VAS) to rate children's natural productions of target /s/θ/q/, /t /-/k /, and /d /-/G/ in word-initial position. Listeners rated the perceived distance between individual productions and ideal productions. Results: The experienced listeners' ratings differed from the inexperienced listeners' ratings in four ways: They had higher intrarater reliability, showed less bias toward a more frequent sound, and were more closely related to the acoustic characteristics of the children's speech. In addition, the experienced listeners' responses were related to a different set of predictor variables. Conclusion: Results suggest that experience working as an SLP leads to better perception of phonetic detail in children's speech. Limitations and future research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10580360
DOI:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/11-0009)