Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Students’ perceptions of foundation degrees. |
| Authors: |
Ooms, A.1, Burke, L.M.1, Marks-Maran, D.J.1 marksmaran@btopenworld.com, Webb, M.2, Cooper, D.2 |
| Source: |
Journal of Further & Higher Education. Aug2012, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p403-421. 19p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Introductory courses (Education), *Student surveys, *Educational evaluation, *Cooperative education, *Vocational education, Quantitative research |
| Geographic Terms: |
United Kingdom |
| Abstract: |
In 2008 there were 87,339 people enrolled on foundation degrees (FDs) in the UK (Foundation Degree Forward, 2009), and educational institutions in the UK offered 1700 different foundation degrees in over 25 subjects, with nearly 900 more in development (Action on Access, 2010). In addition, student views are seen to be of importance, as demonstrated by the National Student Survey and the notion of the student as consumer. This paper reports on a study of the views of students undertaking FDs in one university. A mixed-methods evaluation approach was used. Data were collected from students through questionnaires, interviews and focus groups. This was an ambitious project that yielded a vast amount and range of qualitative and quantitative data across multiple cohorts of seven different foundation degrees. Overall, students’ perceptions are positive, although some findings vary from one foundation degree to another. Across all subjects, students were agreed on their positive rating on five of the key elements of FDs. There was also agreement that employers did not, on the whole, value the foundation degree qualification. This paper presents the findings of this study and conclusions are drawn that add to the literature about FDs that will be of relevance to those involved in the development and delivery of FDs. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Further & Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
