View in EDS

Comparing Culturally Accommodated Versus Standard Group CBT for Latino Adolescents With Substance Use Disorders: A Pilot Study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparing Culturally Accommodated Versus Standard Group CBT for Latino Adolescents With Substance Use Disorders: A Pilot Study.
Authors: Burrow-Sanchez, Jason J.1 jason.burrow-sanchez@utah.edu, Wrona, Megan1
Source: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology. Oct2012, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p773-783. 11p.
Subject Terms: *Comparative studies, Substance abuse treatment, Cultural adaptation, Health of Hispanic Americans, Empirical research, Minorities
Abstract: Studies comparing empirically supported substance abuse treatments versus their culturally accommo-dated counterparts with participants from a specific ethnic minority group are lacking in the literature. To address this gap, this pilot study was conducted to compare the feasibility and relative efficacy of an empirically supported standard version of cognitive-behavioral substance abuse treatment (S-CBT) to a culturally accommodated version (A-CBT) with a sample of Latino adolescents. This study was guided by a Cultural Accommodation Model for Substance Abuse Treatment (CAM-SAT). Thirty-five Latino adolescents (mean age = 15.49) were randomly assigned to one of two 12-week group-based treatment conditions (S-CBT = 18; A-CBT = 17) with assessments conducted at pretreatment, posttreatment and 3-month follow-up. Results indicated similar retention and satisfaction rates for participants in both treatment conditions. In addition, participants in both conditions demonstrated significant decreases in substance use from pre- to posttreatment with slight increases at 3-month follow-up; however, substance use outcomes were moderated by two cultural variables: ethnic identity and familism. Implications of these findings within the context of conducting clinical trials with Latino adolescents are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology is the property of American Psychological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Studies comparing empirically supported substance abuse treatments versus their culturally accommo-dated counterparts with participants from a specific ethnic minority group are lacking in the literature. To address this gap, this pilot study was conducted to compare the feasibility and relative efficacy of an empirically supported standard version of cognitive-behavioral substance abuse treatment (S-CBT) to a culturally accommodated version (A-CBT) with a sample of Latino adolescents. This study was guided by a Cultural Accommodation Model for Substance Abuse Treatment (CAM-SAT). Thirty-five Latino adolescents (mean age = 15.49) were randomly assigned to one of two 12-week group-based treatment conditions (S-CBT = 18; A-CBT = 17) with assessments conducted at pretreatment, posttreatment and 3-month follow-up. Results indicated similar retention and satisfaction rates for participants in both treatment conditions. In addition, participants in both conditions demonstrated significant decreases in substance use from pre- to posttreatment with slight increases at 3-month follow-up; however, substance use outcomes were moderated by two cultural variables: ethnic identity and familism. Implications of these findings within the context of conducting clinical trials with Latino adolescents are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10999809
DOI:10.1037/a0029439