Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Two Kinds of Argument? |
| Authors: |
Newton, Paul E.1 p.newton@ioe.ac.uk. |
| Source: |
Journal of Educational Measurement. Spring2013, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p105-109. 5p. 2 Charts. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Educational tests & measurements, *Test interpretation, *Test validity, *Standardized tests, Hermeneutics |
| Abstract: |
Kane distinguishes between two kinds of argument: the interpretation/use argument and the validity argument. This commentary considers whether there really are two kinds of argument, two arguments, or just one. It concludes that there is just one argument: the validity argument. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Educational Measurement is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
