Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Do ethics classes teach ethics? |
| Authors: |
Curzer, Howard J., Sattler, Sabrina, DuPree, Devin G., Smith-Genthôs, K. Rachelle |
| Source: |
Theory & Research in Education. Nov2014, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p366-382. 17p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Moral education, *Ethics education, *Evaluation, Defining Issues Test, Moral development, Metaethics |
| Abstract: |
The ethics assessment industry is currently dominated by the second version of the Defining Issues Test (DIT2). In this article, we describe an alternative assessment instrument called the Sphere-Specific Moral Reasoning and Theory Survey (SMARTS), which measures the respondent’s level of moral development in several respects. We describe eight difficulties that an instrument must overcome in order to assess ethics classes successfully. We argue that the DIT2 fails to solve these problems, and that the SMARTS succeeds. The SMARTS was administered as pre-test and post-test during several semesters to ethics and non-ethics classes. Ethics students improved significantly more than non-ethics students in both moral theory choice and moral reasoning. Thus, ethics classes do indeed teach ethics. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
|
Copyright of Theory & Research in Education is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
