Retraction Note: Autism-like symptoms by exposure to air pollution and valproic acid–induced in male rats.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Retraction Note: Autism-like symptoms by exposure to air pollution and valproic acid–induced in male rats.
Authors: Imam, Bahran1 (AUTHOR), Rahmatinia, Masoumeh2 (AUTHOR), Shahsavani, Abbas1,3 (AUTHOR) ashahsavani@gmail.com, Khodagholi, Fariba4 (AUTHOR), Hopke, Philip K.5,6 (AUTHOR), Bazazzpour, Shahriyar2 (AUTHOR), Hadei, Mostafa7 (AUTHOR), Yarahmadi, Maryam8 (AUTHOR), Abdollahifar, Mohammad-Amin9 (AUTHOR), Torkmahalleh, Mehdi Amouei10 (AUTHOR), Kermani, Majid11 (AUTHOR), Ilkhani, Saba9 (AUTHOR), MirBehbahani, Seyed Hamidreza4 (AUTHOR)
Source: Environmental Science & Pollution Research. Mar2024, Vol. 31 Issue 15, p23283-23283. 1p.
Subject Terms: *Rats, *Air pollution, *Males, *Environmental sciences, *Symptoms
Abstract: This document is a retraction note from the journal Environmental Science & Pollution Research. The article titled "Autism-like symptoms by exposure to air pollution and valproic acid-induced in male rats" has been retracted by the Editor-in-Chief due to concerns about similarities in multiple panels of figures and irregularities in the western blot backgrounds. The authors were unable to provide the original full gel images of the blots presented in Figure 14. Some of the authors do not agree with the retraction, and the publisher has been unable to contact two of the authors. Springer Nature, the publisher, remains neutral in regards to jurisdictional claims and institutional affiliations. [Extracted from the article]
Database: Energy & Power Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:This document is a retraction note from the journal Environmental Science & Pollution Research. The article titled "Autism-like symptoms by exposure to air pollution and valproic acid-induced in male rats" has been retracted by the Editor-in-Chief due to concerns about similarities in multiple panels of figures and irregularities in the western blot backgrounds. The authors were unable to provide the original full gel images of the blots presented in Figure 14. Some of the authors do not agree with the retraction, and the publisher has been unable to contact two of the authors. Springer Nature, the publisher, remains neutral in regards to jurisdictional claims and institutional affiliations. [Extracted from the article]
ISSN:09441344
DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-32660-z