The Effect on Memory of Instructions to Forget. Final Report.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Effect on Memory of Instructions to Forget. Final Report.
Authors: Woodward, Addison E., Albion Coll., MI.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 59
Publication Date: 1973
Sponsoring Agency: National Center for Educational Research and Development (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. Regional Research Program.
Contract Number: OEG-5-71-0023(509)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cues, Educational Research, Extinction (Psychology), Memory, Recall (Psychology), Retention (Psychology)
Abstract: This report describes eight experiments dealing with intentional forgetting. The results of the first experiment indicated that not attempting to recall items did not affect appreciably the later recall of these items. The second, third, and fourth experiments indicated that with blocked intra-serial cuing, the more processing allotted to an item, the more likely it was to be remembered. In the fifth, sixth, and seventh experiments, items were presented individually. They were then followed by a blank interval of time that could vary, and then the item's instruction appeared. It was found that final recognition for remember and forget items was positively related to the length of the interval, while final recall was not. In the eighth experiment it was found that implicit forget items were more likely than explicit forget items to be intruded in immediate recall, to be recalled during final recall, and to be recognized in a final recognition test. (DI)
Journal Code: RIEOCT1973
Entry Date: 1973
Accession Number: ED076950
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED076950
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED076950
AccessLevel: 3
PubTypeId: unknown
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Effect on Memory of Instructions to Forget. Final Report.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Woodward%2C+Addison+E%2E%22">Woodward, Addison E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Albion+Coll%2E%2C+MI%2E%22">Albion Coll., MI.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 59
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1973
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Center for Educational Research and Development (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. Regional Research Program.
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: OEG-5-71-0023(509)
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cues%22">Cues</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Research%22">Educational Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Extinction+%28Psychology%29%22">Extinction (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memory%22">Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recall+%28Psychology%29%22">Recall (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retention+%28Psychology%29%22">Retention (Psychology)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This report describes eight experiments dealing with intentional forgetting. The results of the first experiment indicated that not attempting to recall items did not affect appreciably the later recall of these items. The second, third, and fourth experiments indicated that with blocked intra-serial cuing, the more processing allotted to an item, the more likely it was to be remembered. In the fifth, sixth, and seventh experiments, items were presented individually. They were then followed by a blank interval of time that could vary, and then the item's instruction appeared. It was found that final recognition for remember and forget items was positively related to the length of the interval, while final recall was not. In the eighth experiment it was found that implicit forget items were more likely than explicit forget items to be intruded in immediate recall, to be recalled during final recall, and to be recognized in a final recognition test. (DI)
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: Journal Code
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIEOCT1973%22">RIEOCT1973</searchLink>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1973
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED076950
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED076950
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 59
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cues
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Extinction (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Recall (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Retention (Psychology)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Effect on Memory of Instructions to Forget. Final Report.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Albion Coll., MI.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Woodward, Addison E.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Type: published
              Y: 1973
ResultId 1