Faculty Activity Analysis: Procedures Manual.
Saved in:
| Title: | Faculty Activity Analysis: Procedures Manual. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Boulder, CO. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 146 |
| Publication Date: | 1973 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Inst. of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. |
| Descriptors: | Faculty, Higher Education, Noninstructional Responsibility, Surveys, Teacher Welfare, Teaching Assignment, Teaching Load, Working Hours |
| Abstract: | This document presents the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems' (NCHEMS) faculty activity survey instrument and discusses the procedural questions involved in conducting an activity survey. Recommended procedures are given where appropriate. Some of the concerns confronting an institution that is initiating an activity survey are identified and discussed, such as: When the survey should be conducted? Should the institution sample faculty or conduct a census? What should be the survey time period? What are the alternative methods of administering the survey? and What is the effect of each of these in the resulting data? Some of the larger issues surrounding a faculty activity analysis are discussed. These include (1) the question of the accuracy and consistency of faculty activity information; (2) the effect that altering the survey instrument has upon the resulting data; and (3) the general question of faculty acceptance of an activity survey. (Author) |
| Entry Date: | 1974 |
| Accession Number: | ED084998 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED084998 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED084998 AccessLevel: 3 PubTypeId: unknown PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Faculty Activity Analysis: Procedures Manual. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Western+Interstate+Commission+for+Higher+Education%2C+Boulder%2C+CO%2E+National+Center+for+Higher+Education+Management+Systems%2E%22">Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Boulder, CO. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 146 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1973 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Inst. of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty%22">Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Noninstructional+Responsibility%22">Noninstructional Responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Welfare%22">Teacher Welfare</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Assignment%22">Teaching Assignment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Load%22">Teaching Load</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Working+Hours%22">Working Hours</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This document presents the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems' (NCHEMS) faculty activity survey instrument and discusses the procedural questions involved in conducting an activity survey. Recommended procedures are given where appropriate. Some of the concerns confronting an institution that is initiating an activity survey are identified and discussed, such as: When the survey should be conducted? Should the institution sample faculty or conduct a census? What should be the survey time period? What are the alternative methods of administering the survey? and What is the effect of each of these in the resulting data? Some of the larger issues surrounding a faculty activity analysis are discussed. These include (1) the question of the accuracy and consistency of faculty activity information; (2) the effect that altering the survey instrument has upon the resulting data; and (3) the general question of faculty acceptance of an activity survey. (Author) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1974 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED084998 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED084998 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 146 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Noninstructional Responsibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Welfare Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Assignment Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Load Type: general – SubjectFull: Working Hours Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Faculty Activity Analysis: Procedures Manual. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Boulder, CO. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 1973 |
| ResultId | 1 |
