Memory by Ear and by Eye: Relationships to Reading Achievement.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Memory by Ear and by Eye: Relationships to Reading Achievement.
Authors: Bruning, Roger H.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 1977
Document Type: Speeches/Meeting Papers
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Cognitive Processes, Failure, Intermediate Grades, Memory, Reading Difficulty, Reading Processes, Reading Research, Success, Visual Perception
Abstract: In two experiments, visual and auditory memory were tested for good and for poor readers from the upper elementary grades. Under experimenter-blind conditions, no reading group differences existed for single-mode presentation in recognition frequency or recognition latency. With a multimodal presentation, latencies for poor readers were similar to those for the single-mode presentation. Good readers, however, had significantly faster latencies with multiple input. Generally, results supported dual encoding and self-terminating memory search hypotheses for previously encoded stimuli. Implications of the latency differences between reader groups are discussed with respect to the reading process and reading theory. (Author)
Notes: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New York, New York, April 1977)
Journal Code: RIEAUG1977
Entry Date: 1977
Accession Number: ED136247
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:In two experiments, visual and auditory memory were tested for good and for poor readers from the upper elementary grades. Under experimenter-blind conditions, no reading group differences existed for single-mode presentation in recognition frequency or recognition latency. With a multimodal presentation, latencies for poor readers were similar to those for the single-mode presentation. Good readers, however, had significantly faster latencies with multiple input. Generally, results supported dual encoding and self-terminating memory search hypotheses for previously encoded stimuli. Implications of the latency differences between reader groups are discussed with respect to the reading process and reading theory. (Author)