Project SOUL: Computer Training Program for High School Students from Disadvantaged Areas. Part III, The Scientific Programming Course. Technical Report.
Saved in:
| Title: | Project SOUL: Computer Training Program for High School Students from Disadvantaged Areas. Part III, The Scientific Programming Course. Technical Report. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Lew, Art, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dept. of Electrical Engineering. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 135 |
| Publication Date: | 1971 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Compensatory Education, Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Science Education, Computers, Curriculum Development, Disadvantaged Youth, Educationally Disadvantaged, Mathematics, Program Content, Program Descriptions, Program Evaluation, Programing, Sciences, Secondary Education, Summer Programs |
| Abstract: | This report details the Scientific Programming Course that is a part of "Project SOUL." The course is intended for underprivileged high school juniors and seniors having an interest in mathematics or science and aspirations to attend college. The report is divided into three sections. In section I, the administration and operation of the course as it was offered in the summer of 1970 is discussed. In section II, the contents of the course are described. This section may be used as a guide for the design of curricula for future courses of the same nature. Evaluation of the course and suggested improvements are given in section III of the report. Various course materials and information are appended. (MK) |
| Entry Date: | 1980 |
| Accession Number: | ED180765 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | This report details the Scientific Programming Course that is a part of "Project SOUL." The course is intended for underprivileged high school juniors and seniors having an interest in mathematics or science and aspirations to attend college. The report is divided into three sections. In section I, the administration and operation of the course as it was offered in the summer of 1970 is discussed. In section II, the contents of the course are described. This section may be used as a guide for the design of curricula for future courses of the same nature. Evaluation of the course and suggested improvements are given in section III of the report. Various course materials and information are appended. (MK) |
|---|
