View in EDS

Survey of State Procedures for the Validation of Educational Programs. Executive Summary.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Survey of State Procedures for the Validation of Educational Programs. Executive Summary.
Language: English
Authors: Reed, Linda, CEMREL, Inc., St. Louis, MO. R&D Interpretation Service.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 32
Publication Date: 1981
Sponsoring Agency: National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.
Document Type: Reports - Research
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal State Relationship, Information Dissemination, National Surveys, Program Effectiveness, Program Validation, Quality Control, Regional Laboratories, Research and Development Centers, State Departments of Education, Tables (Data), Validated Programs
Geographic Terms: U.S.; Missouri
Abstract: Survey findings on state educational validation procedures show that of the 50 states surveyed, 45 have some form of established procedure for validation promising educational practices. Approximately two-thirds of the states that have validation programs employ either the Identification, Validation, Dissemination (IVD) procedure or some modification of it. Roughly a third of the states reported that they use their own state-developed validation processes. Forty-three states conduct site visits, following prescreening, to verify projects' status on the state's validation criteria. Significant variation occurs in the length of the site visits, the number of team members, and the composition of the teams. Twenty-seven states reported that they provide support to both the developer/demonstrators and the adopter/adapters of validated programs. Close to three-fourths of the states reportedly are involved in some form of cooperative activities with other nearby states. However, the cooperative activities center primarily on implementation of the validation procedure. Few if any states cooperate by actually sharing validated programs. A number of recommendations are made in the general areas of coordination and communication, funding, diffusion efforts, and the scope of the Joint Dissemination Review Panel (JDRP) programs. (Author/MLF)
Notes: A collaborative effort of the Research and Development Exchange. For related documents, see EA 014 269-270 and EA 014 272.
Journal Code: RIEAPR1982
Entry Date: 1982
Accession Number: ED209779
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED209779
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED209779
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Survey of State Procedures for the Validation of Educational Programs. Executive Summary.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Reed%2C+Linda%22">Reed, Linda</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22CEMREL%2C+Inc%2E%2C+St%2E+Louis%2C+MO%2E+R%26D+Interpretation+Service%2E%22">CEMREL, Inc., St. Louis, MO. R&D Interpretation Service.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 32
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1981
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Improvement%22">Educational Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Practices%22">Educational Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+State+Relationship%22">Federal State Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+Dissemination%22">Information Dissemination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Surveys%22">National Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Validation%22">Program Validation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+Control%22">Quality Control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regional+Laboratories%22">Regional Laboratories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+and+Development+Centers%22">Research and Development Centers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Departments+of+Education%22">State Departments of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tables+%28Data%29%22">Tables (Data)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validated+Programs%22">Validated Programs</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22U%2ES%2E%3B+Missouri%22">U.S.; Missouri</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Survey findings on state educational validation procedures show that of the 50 states surveyed, 45 have some form of established procedure for validation promising educational practices. Approximately two-thirds of the states that have validation programs employ either the Identification, Validation, Dissemination (IVD) procedure or some modification of it. Roughly a third of the states reported that they use their own state-developed validation processes. Forty-three states conduct site visits, following prescreening, to verify projects' status on the state's validation criteria. Significant variation occurs in the length of the site visits, the number of team members, and the composition of the teams. Twenty-seven states reported that they provide support to both the developer/demonstrators and the adopter/adapters of validated programs. Close to three-fourths of the states reportedly are involved in some form of cooperative activities with other nearby states. However, the cooperative activities center primarily on implementation of the validation procedure. Few if any states cooperate by actually sharing validated programs. A number of recommendations are made in the general areas of coordination and communication, funding, diffusion efforts, and the scope of the Joint Dissemination Review Panel (JDRP) programs. (Author/MLF)
– Name: Note
  Label: Notes
  Group: Note
  Data: A collaborative effort of the Research and Development Exchange. For related documents, see EA 014 269-270 and EA 014 272.
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: Journal Code
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIEAPR1982%22">RIEAPR1982</searchLink>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1982
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED209779
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED209779
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 32
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Educational Improvement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Practices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Federal State Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information Dissemination
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: National Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Validation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quality Control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regional Laboratories
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research and Development Centers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Departments of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tables (Data)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Validated Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: U.S.; Missouri
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Survey of State Procedures for the Validation of Educational Programs. Executive Summary.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: CEMREL, Inc., St. Louis, MO. R&D Interpretation Service.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Reed, Linda
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 1981
ResultId 1