Information Requirements for Faculty Merit Pay Decisions. AIR 1985 Annual Forum Paper.
Saved in:
| Title: | Information Requirements for Faculty Merit Pay Decisions. AIR 1985 Annual Forum Paper. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Johnson, F. Craig, Tuckman, Bruce W. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 24 |
| Publication Date: | 1985 |
| Intended Audience: | Teachers; Researchers; Administrators; Practitioners |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Speeches/Meeting Papers |
| Descriptors: | College Faculty, College Instruction, College Programs, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Information Needs, Management Information Systems, Merit Pay, Productivity, Records (Forms), Research, Scholarship, Schools of Education, State Universities, Teacher Salaries, Writing for Publication |
| Abstract: | The development of an information system to help College of Education faculty at Florida State University campuses determine the criteria and procedures for awarding merit pay is described. Faculty groups need information that address both the objectives of individual faculty members and institutional goals. Data needed from the following five sources were examined: five-year salary history, faculty activity for current term, faculty assignment form, types of publications individual faculty completed over the previous five years; and the ranking of journals by faculty. Data collected on instruction and research from existing records from 22 programs, six departments, and for the college as a whole are summarized. Findings include: productivity appears unrelated to rewards; instructional and research productivity appear highly related; and the presence of active Ph.D. candidates appears unrelated to research productivity. Using the information system to identify the most productive programs can help direct both rewards and other resources to them. Institutional issues of faculty equity and motivation to maintain an academic culture are considered in light of a salary model. Conclusions are drawn about an information system to monitor faculty rewards. A salary increase form and faculty activity form are included. (SW) |
| Entry Date: | 1985 |
| Accession Number: | ED259676 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED259676 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED259676 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Information Requirements for Faculty Merit Pay Decisions. AIR 1985 Annual Forum Paper. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnson%2C+F%2E+Craig%22">Johnson, F. Craig</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tuckman%2C+Bruce+W%2E%22">Tuckman, Bruce W.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 24 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1985 – Name: Audience Label: Intended Audience Group: Audnce Data: Teachers; Researchers; Administrators; Practitioners – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Instruction%22">College Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Programs%22">College Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Evaluation%22">Faculty Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+Needs%22">Information Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Management+Information+Systems%22">Management Information Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Merit+Pay%22">Merit Pay</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Productivity%22">Productivity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Records+%28Forms%29%22">Records (Forms)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarship%22">Scholarship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Schools+of+Education%22">Schools of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Universities%22">State Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Salaries%22">Teacher Salaries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+for+Publication%22">Writing for Publication</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The development of an information system to help College of Education faculty at Florida State University campuses determine the criteria and procedures for awarding merit pay is described. Faculty groups need information that address both the objectives of individual faculty members and institutional goals. Data needed from the following five sources were examined: five-year salary history, faculty activity for current term, faculty assignment form, types of publications individual faculty completed over the previous five years; and the ranking of journals by faculty. Data collected on instruction and research from existing records from 22 programs, six departments, and for the college as a whole are summarized. Findings include: productivity appears unrelated to rewards; instructional and research productivity appear highly related; and the presence of active Ph.D. candidates appears unrelated to research productivity. Using the information system to identify the most productive programs can help direct both rewards and other resources to them. Institutional issues of faculty equity and motivation to maintain an academic culture are considered in light of a salary model. Conclusions are drawn about an information system to monitor faculty rewards. A salary increase form and faculty activity form are included. (SW) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1985 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED259676 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED259676 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 24 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: College Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: College Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Information Needs Type: general – SubjectFull: Management Information Systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Merit Pay Type: general – SubjectFull: Productivity Type: general – SubjectFull: Records (Forms) Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Scholarship Type: general – SubjectFull: Schools of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: State Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Salaries Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing for Publication Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Information Requirements for Faculty Merit Pay Decisions. AIR 1985 Annual Forum Paper. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Johnson, F. Craig – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tuckman, Bruce W. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Type: published Y: 1985 |
| ResultId | 1 |