Participant Evaluation of the Community College Leadership Institute, June 11-22, 1990.
Saved in:
| Title: | Participant Evaluation of the Community College Leadership Institute, June 11-22, 1990. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Crow, Sue E., Taylor, Mark Thomas, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh. Dept. of Adult and Community Coll. Education. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| Publication Date: | 1990 |
| Intended Audience: | Administrators; Practitioners |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative Numerical/Quantitative Data |
| Descriptors: | Administrators, College Administration, Community Colleges, Credit Courses, Institutes (Training Programs), Leadership Training, Likert Scales, Participant Satisfaction, Professional Continuing Education, Program Evaluation, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Tables (Data), Two Year Colleges |
| Geographic Terms: | North Carolina |
| Abstract: | Most of the 27 enrollees in the institute were employed in administrative positions within the North Carolina Community College System. The institute consisted primarily of 3-hour presentations on topics related to the conference theme of "Institutional Effectiveness in Building Communities." Two types of evaluations were conducted. The first was an informal, oral-feedback evaluation held at the close of the first week of the institute and used to improve on the subsequent week's activities. The second evaluation consisted of a written survey in which participants indicated their satisfaction with the institute activities. All but one of the 27 participants returned a completed evaluation form. Major findings included the following: (1) of the 27 institute participants, 52% enrolled for credit in both courses offered during the institute, and 44% participated on a non-credit, continuing education basis; (2) on a rating scale of 1 (low satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction), 92% of the 361 total items responded to received a rating of either a 4 or 5, with an overall composite rating of 4.55 for the institute; (3) no responses of 1 or 2 were given for any item by any respondent; (4) 76% of institute presenters were rated either above average or superior; and (5) items receiving the highest ratings were interaction between students and presenters, the quality of the presentations, and national and/or system-wide perspective provided. Data tables, the program of institute events, and a list of participants are included. (JMC) |
| Entry Date: | 1991 |
| Accession Number: | ED327246 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Most of the 27 enrollees in the institute were employed in administrative positions within the North Carolina Community College System. The institute consisted primarily of 3-hour presentations on topics related to the conference theme of "Institutional Effectiveness in Building Communities." Two types of evaluations were conducted. The first was an informal, oral-feedback evaluation held at the close of the first week of the institute and used to improve on the subsequent week's activities. The second evaluation consisted of a written survey in which participants indicated their satisfaction with the institute activities. All but one of the 27 participants returned a completed evaluation form. Major findings included the following: (1) of the 27 institute participants, 52% enrolled for credit in both courses offered during the institute, and 44% participated on a non-credit, continuing education basis; (2) on a rating scale of 1 (low satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction), 92% of the 361 total items responded to received a rating of either a 4 or 5, with an overall composite rating of 4.55 for the institute; (3) no responses of 1 or 2 were given for any item by any respondent; (4) 76% of institute presenters were rated either above average or superior; and (5) items receiving the highest ratings were interaction between students and presenters, the quality of the presentations, and national and/or system-wide perspective provided. Data tables, the program of institute events, and a list of participants are included. (JMC) |
|---|
