SUNY Stony Brook and the SUNY University Centers: Analysis of Monographic Acquisitions, 1984-1994.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: SUNY Stony Brook and the SUNY University Centers: Analysis of Monographic Acquisitions, 1984-1994.
Language: English
Authors: Dole, Wanda, State Univ. of New York, Stony Brook. Library.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 70
Publication Date: 1996
Document Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Comparative Analysis, Consortia, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Higher Education, Library Acquisition, Library Collection Development, Library Cooperation, Library Statistics, Monographs, Optical Data Disks, Purchasing
Abstract: In 1989, the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) introduced a microcomputer-based evaluation tool called the Collection Analysis CD. In 1993, the SUNY Stony Brook Libraries used this tool to measure its collections against those of 27 Association of Research Libraries (ARL) peer libraries and of a "mythical" peer group. In 1996, the libraries of the State University of New York (SUNY) at Stony Brook used this CD-ROM to compare its collections to those of the SUNY University Center libraries at Albany, Binghamton, and Buffalo. Because these four libraries have formed a consortium for resource sharing and cooperative collection development, collection evaluation is seen as the first step toward drafting resource sharing agreements and assigning collection responsibilities. Five tables provide lists of subdivisions of ARL member institutions, a list of large academic libraries, and a list of priority academic programs at SUNY Stony Brook. Monograph purchases of each of the four consortium libraries are illustrated with 42 bar graphs. The consortium's total acquisitions are compared against totals from ARL members and large academic libraries; then the purchases of each individual library in various priority programs and other subject areas are compared to purchases in the same areas made by the other three members of the consortium. Data collectors found that while Stony Brook's capacity for acquisition did not compare favorably to the average ARL member, it was only slightly above or below Albany, Binghamton, and Buffalo in most disciplines. (Author/BEW)
Entry Date: 1996
Accession Number: ED395588
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED395588
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED395588
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Electronic Resource
PubTypeId: electronicResource
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: SUNY Stony Brook and the SUNY University Centers: Analysis of Monographic Acquisitions, 1984-1994.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dole%2C+Wanda%22">Dole, Wanda</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22State+Univ%2E+of+New+York%2C+Stony+Brook%2E+Library%2E%22">State Univ. of New York, Stony Brook. Library.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 70
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1996
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Numerical/Quantitative Data<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Libraries%22">Academic Libraries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consortia%22">Consortia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Analysis%22">Data Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Collection%22">Data Collection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+Acquisition%22">Library Acquisition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+Collection+Development%22">Library Collection Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+Cooperation%22">Library Cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+Statistics%22">Library Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Monographs%22">Monographs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Optical+Data+Disks%22">Optical Data Disks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Purchasing%22">Purchasing</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In 1989, the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) introduced a microcomputer-based evaluation tool called the Collection Analysis CD. In 1993, the SUNY Stony Brook Libraries used this tool to measure its collections against those of 27 Association of Research Libraries (ARL) peer libraries and of a "mythical" peer group. In 1996, the libraries of the State University of New York (SUNY) at Stony Brook used this CD-ROM to compare its collections to those of the SUNY University Center libraries at Albany, Binghamton, and Buffalo. Because these four libraries have formed a consortium for resource sharing and cooperative collection development, collection evaluation is seen as the first step toward drafting resource sharing agreements and assigning collection responsibilities. Five tables provide lists of subdivisions of ARL member institutions, a list of large academic libraries, and a list of priority academic programs at SUNY Stony Brook. Monograph purchases of each of the four consortium libraries are illustrated with 42 bar graphs. The consortium's total acquisitions are compared against totals from ARL members and large academic libraries; then the purchases of each individual library in various priority programs and other subject areas are compared to purchases in the same areas made by the other three members of the consortium. Data collectors found that while Stony Brook's capacity for acquisition did not compare favorably to the average ARL member, it was only slightly above or below Albany, Binghamton, and Buffalo in most disciplines. (Author/BEW)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1996
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED395588
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED395588
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 70
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Academic Libraries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Consortia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data Collection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Library Acquisition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Library Collection Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Library Cooperation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Library Statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Monographs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Optical Data Disks
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Purchasing
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: SUNY Stony Brook and the SUNY University Centers: Analysis of Monographic Acquisitions, 1984-1994.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: State Univ. of New York, Stony Brook. Library.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dole, Wanda
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Type: published
              Y: 1996
ResultId 1