Leadership in the Making: Impact and Insights from Leadership Development Programs in U.S. Colleges and Universities. Executive Summary.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Leadership in the Making: Impact and Insights from Leadership Development Programs in U.S. Colleges and Universities. Executive Summary.
Language: English
Authors: Zimmerman-Oster, Kathleen, Burkhardt, John C., Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.
Availability: W. K. Kellogg Foundation, P.O. Box 550, Battle Creek, MI 49016-0550. Tel: 800-819-9997 (Toll Free). Web site: http://www.wkkf.org.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 29
Publication Date: 2000
Document Type: Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Leadership Training, Program Effectiveness, Young Adults
Geographic Terms: U.S.; Michigan
Abstract: Between 1990 and 1998, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation funded 31 projects focused on leadership development in college-age young adults. This summary report presents an overview of the results from an external retrospective evaluation of approximately 60 percent of the funded projects, primarily those based in higher education institutions. It begins by describing the evaluation methodology, followed by a description of the evaluation outcomes from four components: (1) archival review, survey, interviews, and site visits; (2) grantee evaluation results; (3) short-term impact evaluation (the Penn State Erie Evaluation Project); and (4) long-term impact evaluation (the UCLA Higher Education Research Institute Analysis). The report then discusses the hallmarks of exemplary projects, grouped into four categories: context, philosophy, sustainability, and common practices. Examples of exemplary projects are also included. (EV)
Journal Code: RIEAPR2001
Entry Date: 2001
Accession Number: ED446577
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Between 1990 and 1998, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation funded 31 projects focused on leadership development in college-age young adults. This summary report presents an overview of the results from an external retrospective evaluation of approximately 60 percent of the funded projects, primarily those based in higher education institutions. It begins by describing the evaluation methodology, followed by a description of the evaluation outcomes from four components: (1) archival review, survey, interviews, and site visits; (2) grantee evaluation results; (3) short-term impact evaluation (the Penn State Erie Evaluation Project); and (4) long-term impact evaluation (the UCLA Higher Education Research Institute Analysis). The report then discusses the hallmarks of exemplary projects, grouped into four categories: context, philosophy, sustainability, and common practices. Examples of exemplary projects are also included. (EV)