An Evaluability Assessment of Responsible Fatherhood Programs. Final Report.
Saved in:
| Title: | An Evaluability Assessment of Responsible Fatherhood Programs. Final Report. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Barnow, Burt S., Stapleton, David C., Office of Child Support Enforcement (DHHS), Washington, DC., Lewin Group, Inc., Washington, DC., Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. |
| Availability: | For full text: http://fatherhood.hhs.gov/evaluaby/intro.htm. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 156 |
| Publication Date: | 1997 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (DHHS), Washington, DC. Ford Foundation, New York, NY. |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Cost Effectiveness, Data Collection, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Evaluation Problems, Fathers, Formative Evaluation, Management Information Systems, Parents, Program Descriptions, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Program Implementation, Sampling, Summative Evaluation |
| Abstract: | Noting the paucity of information on the effectiveness of the growing numbers of programs promoting responsible fatherhood, this report examines the evaluability of responsible fatherhood programs. The report provides policymakers with an evaluation design for use with a variety of responsible fatherhood programs, and gives direction to organizations supporting or conducting such evaluations. Activities informing the report included interviews with experts, a literature review on fatherhood issues, site visits to five programs, and input from experts on program evaluation. Chapter 1 of the report presents the aims of the fatherhood program, describes components of program evaluation, and discusses program readiness for evaluation. Chapter 2 describes procedures for conducting a process evaluation, including analysis and reporting. Chapter 3 discusses major design choices made in planning an impact evaluation. Chapter 4 describes potential outcomes of fatherhood interventions, suggests specific measures, and discusses difficulties that may be encountered while developing outcome measures. Chapter 5 includes a discussion of how and why explanatory variables are used in an impact analysis. Chapter 6 addresses issues related to selecting the sample and data collection methods. Chapter 7 discusses why a participation analysis should be conducted in conjunction with an impact evaluation and suggests appropriate methods. Chapter 8 discusses the analysis of the evaluation data that will be necessary to estimate the impacts of responsible fatherhood programs. Chapter 9 provides summary and concluding comments. The report's five appendices list the experts interviewed for the project, summarize site visits, provide sample discussion guide for conducting a process evaluation, contain preliminary evaluation findings from the Racine Goodwill Industries Fatherhood Program, and provide a technical discussion of participation and impact analysis methods. (KB) |
| Entry Date: | 2002 |
| Accession Number: | ED463838 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED463838 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED463838 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: An Evaluability Assessment of Responsible Fatherhood Programs. Final Report. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Barnow%2C+Burt+S%2E%22">Barnow, Burt S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stapleton%2C+David+C%2E%22">Stapleton, David C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Office+of+Child+Support+Enforcement+%28DHHS%29%2C+Washington%2C+DC%2E%22">Office of Child Support Enforcement (DHHS), Washington, DC.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lewin+Group%2C+Inc%2E%2C+Washington%2C+DC%2E%22">Lewin Group, Inc., Washington, DC.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johns+Hopkins+Univ%2E%2C+Baltimore%2C+MD%2E%22">Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD.</searchLink> – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: For full text: http://fatherhood.hhs.gov/evaluaby/intro.htm. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 156 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1997 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (DHHS), Washington, DC.<br />Ford Foundation, New York, NY. – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+Effectiveness%22">Cost Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Collection%22">Data Collection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Needs%22">Evaluation Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Problems%22">Evaluation Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fathers%22">Fathers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Formative+Evaluation%22">Formative Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Management+Information+Systems%22">Management Information Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parents%22">Parents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Descriptions%22">Program Descriptions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Implementation%22">Program Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sampling%22">Sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Summative+Evaluation%22">Summative Evaluation</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Noting the paucity of information on the effectiveness of the growing numbers of programs promoting responsible fatherhood, this report examines the evaluability of responsible fatherhood programs. The report provides policymakers with an evaluation design for use with a variety of responsible fatherhood programs, and gives direction to organizations supporting or conducting such evaluations. Activities informing the report included interviews with experts, a literature review on fatherhood issues, site visits to five programs, and input from experts on program evaluation. Chapter 1 of the report presents the aims of the fatherhood program, describes components of program evaluation, and discusses program readiness for evaluation. Chapter 2 describes procedures for conducting a process evaluation, including analysis and reporting. Chapter 3 discusses major design choices made in planning an impact evaluation. Chapter 4 describes potential outcomes of fatherhood interventions, suggests specific measures, and discusses difficulties that may be encountered while developing outcome measures. Chapter 5 includes a discussion of how and why explanatory variables are used in an impact analysis. Chapter 6 addresses issues related to selecting the sample and data collection methods. Chapter 7 discusses why a participation analysis should be conducted in conjunction with an impact evaluation and suggests appropriate methods. Chapter 8 discusses the analysis of the evaluation data that will be necessary to estimate the impacts of responsible fatherhood programs. Chapter 9 provides summary and concluding comments. The report's five appendices list the experts interviewed for the project, summarize site visits, provide sample discussion guide for conducting a process evaluation, contain preliminary evaluation findings from the Racine Goodwill Industries Fatherhood Program, and provide a technical discussion of participation and impact analysis methods. (KB) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2002 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED463838 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED463838 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 156 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Cost Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Data Collection Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Needs Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Problems Type: general – SubjectFull: Fathers Type: general – SubjectFull: Formative Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Management Information Systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Parents Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Descriptions Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Implementation Type: general – SubjectFull: Sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Summative Evaluation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: An Evaluability Assessment of Responsible Fatherhood Programs. Final Report. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Office of Child Support Enforcement (DHHS), Washington, DC. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lewin Group, Inc., Washington, DC. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Barnow, Burt S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stapleton, David C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 06 M: 08 Type: published Y: 1997 |
| ResultId | 1 |