View in EDS

Software Developers' Attitudes toward User-Centered Design.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Software Developers' Attitudes toward User-Centered Design.
Language: English
Authors: Frick, Theodore, Boling, Elizabeth, Kim, Kyong-Jee, Oswald, Daniel, Zazelenchuk, Todd
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2001
Document Type: Reports - Research
Speeches/Meeting Papers
Descriptors: Computer Software, Computer Software Development, Computer System Design, Corporations, Design Preferences, Designers, User Friendly Interface, User Needs (Information), Users (Information)
Abstract: The concepts of usability and user-centered design (UCD) have grown in popularity over the past 20 years as measured by the number of research and mainstream articles devoted to their discussion. As with all new developments, however, there are always the questions of how things work in practice compared to theory. A survey of 83 software developers, mostly in small- to medium-sized companies in variety of industries was conducted to examine software developers' views on UCD and usability practices and to illuminate how current practices relate to theory. Results of a descriptive analysis of the 22 Likert-scale attitude question items suggested that respondents had moderately positive attitudes towards UCD activities and discipline. The Likert-scale items were subsequently factor-analyzed and the results suggested that the respondents tended to agree that UCD is worth the effort and cost. They also tended to agree that it is important to conduct many use test sessions and they learned a lot about their products from user test sessions. Software developers who reported that their companies followed important UCD practices were more likely to agree with the view that UCD is worth the effort and cost. Those who have attended usability test sessions were more likely to agree that user test sessions are valuable, and that UCD is worth the effort and cost. However, those who have attended usability test sessions also were more likely to agree that UCD is more work and costs more than conventional development activities. Also, significantly more good usability practices were reported by software developers who worked on teams that either hired usability consultants or had a usability specialist on their teams compared with those who had no usability specialists at all. While software developers held positive attitudes towards UCD, it was notable that they did not report that their companies used practices that are central to UCD. It appears that, while many software developers agree that UCD is a good idea, it tends not to be implemented fully in practice. (Contains 18 references.) (Author/AEF)
Entry Date: 2003
Accession Number: ED470084
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED470084
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED470084
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Software Developers' Attitudes toward User-Centered Design.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Frick%2C+Theodore%22">Frick, Theodore</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boling%2C+Elizabeth%22">Boling, Elizabeth</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kim%2C+Kyong-Jee%22">Kim, Kyong-Jee</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oswald%2C+Daniel%22">Oswald, Daniel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zazelenchuk%2C+Todd%22">Zazelenchuk, Todd</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 9
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2001
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software%22">Computer Software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software+Development%22">Computer Software Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+System+Design%22">Computer System Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Corporations%22">Corporations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Design+Preferences%22">Design Preferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Designers%22">Designers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22User+Friendly+Interface%22">User Friendly Interface</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22User+Needs+%28Information%29%22">User Needs (Information)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Users+%28Information%29%22">Users (Information)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The concepts of usability and user-centered design (UCD) have grown in popularity over the past 20 years as measured by the number of research and mainstream articles devoted to their discussion. As with all new developments, however, there are always the questions of how things work in practice compared to theory. A survey of 83 software developers, mostly in small- to medium-sized companies in variety of industries was conducted to examine software developers' views on UCD and usability practices and to illuminate how current practices relate to theory. Results of a descriptive analysis of the 22 Likert-scale attitude question items suggested that respondents had moderately positive attitudes towards UCD activities and discipline. The Likert-scale items were subsequently factor-analyzed and the results suggested that the respondents tended to agree that UCD is worth the effort and cost. They also tended to agree that it is important to conduct many use test sessions and they learned a lot about their products from user test sessions. Software developers who reported that their companies followed important UCD practices were more likely to agree with the view that UCD is worth the effort and cost. Those who have attended usability test sessions were more likely to agree that user test sessions are valuable, and that UCD is worth the effort and cost. However, those who have attended usability test sessions also were more likely to agree that UCD is more work and costs more than conventional development activities. Also, significantly more good usability practices were reported by software developers who worked on teams that either hired usability consultants or had a usability specialist on their teams compared with those who had no usability specialists at all. While software developers held positive attitudes towards UCD, it was notable that they did not report that their companies used practices that are central to UCD. It appears that, while many software developers agree that UCD is a good idea, it tends not to be implemented fully in practice. (Contains 18 references.) (Author/AEF)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2003
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED470084
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED470084
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Computer Software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Software Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer System Design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Corporations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Design Preferences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Designers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: User Friendly Interface
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: User Needs (Information)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Users (Information)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Software Developers' Attitudes toward User-Centered Design.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Frick, Theodore
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boling, Elizabeth
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kim, Kyong-Jee
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Oswald, Daniel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zazelenchuk, Todd
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Type: published
              Y: 2001
ResultId 1