Andragogy Between Theory and Practice.
Saved in:
| Title: | Andragogy Between Theory and Practice. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Klapan, Anita |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 6 |
| Publication Date: | 2002 |
| Document Type: | Opinion Papers Speeches/Meeting Papers |
| Descriptors: | Adoption (Ideas), Adult Education, Adult Learning, Andragogy, Diffusion (Communication), Educational History, Educational Needs, Educational Philosophy, Educational Practices, Educational Principles, Educational Trends, Learning Theories, Lifelong Learning, Needs Assessment, Position Papers, Postsecondary Education, Theory Practice Relationship, Trend Analysis |
| Abstract: | One of the main problems facing andragogy is that its systematic nature is more the result of other theoretical deliberations than those of its own. Until the mid-19th century, andragogy founded its development mainly on prevailing communal, social, economic, political, and cultural conditions in various countries. In the 1950s, andragogy turned increasingly into a science whose goals were directed toward humans and their relationship to the world in which practice is only the result of human's "spiritual praxis." Andragogy must now deal with the theoretical organization of its theory, historically perceive its achievements thus far, and become connected with other sciences to accelerate its own development and simultaneously acquire an identity of its own and an internal coherence as a science. Different individuals still have very different understandings of andragogy. Some consider andragogy a pedagogic discipline, whereas others consider it a relatively autonomous science within the framework of the general sciences of teaching and learning. Yet others consider andragogy a method, skill, theory, or model of adult learning. The starting point of andragogy as an independent science of adult education within the concept of lifelong learning is no longer disputable. Andragogy's autonomy as a science of adult education must now be considered. (10 references) (MN) |
| Entry Date: | 2003 |
| Accession Number: | ED471249 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED471249 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED471249 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Editorial & Opinion PubTypeId: editorialOpinion PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Andragogy Between Theory and Practice. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klapan%2C+Anita%22">Klapan, Anita</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 6 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2002 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Opinion Papers<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adoption+%28Ideas%29%22">Adoption (Ideas)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adult+Education%22">Adult Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adult+Learning%22">Adult Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Andragogy%22">Andragogy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diffusion+%28Communication%29%22">Diffusion (Communication)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+History%22">Educational History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Needs%22">Educational Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Philosophy%22">Educational Philosophy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Practices%22">Educational Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Principles%22">Educational Principles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Trends%22">Educational Trends</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Theories%22">Learning Theories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lifelong+Learning%22">Lifelong Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Needs+Assessment%22">Needs Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Position+Papers%22">Position Papers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+Practice+Relationship%22">Theory Practice Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trend+Analysis%22">Trend Analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: One of the main problems facing andragogy is that its systematic nature is more the result of other theoretical deliberations than those of its own. Until the mid-19th century, andragogy founded its development mainly on prevailing communal, social, economic, political, and cultural conditions in various countries. In the 1950s, andragogy turned increasingly into a science whose goals were directed toward humans and their relationship to the world in which practice is only the result of human's "spiritual praxis." Andragogy must now deal with the theoretical organization of its theory, historically perceive its achievements thus far, and become connected with other sciences to accelerate its own development and simultaneously acquire an identity of its own and an internal coherence as a science. Different individuals still have very different understandings of andragogy. Some consider andragogy a pedagogic discipline, whereas others consider it a relatively autonomous science within the framework of the general sciences of teaching and learning. Yet others consider andragogy a method, skill, theory, or model of adult learning. The starting point of andragogy as an independent science of adult education within the concept of lifelong learning is no longer disputable. Andragogy's autonomy as a science of adult education must now be considered. (10 references) (MN) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2003 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED471249 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED471249 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 6 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Adoption (Ideas) Type: general – SubjectFull: Adult Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Adult Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Andragogy Type: general – SubjectFull: Diffusion (Communication) Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational History Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Needs Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Philosophy Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Practices Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Principles Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Trends Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Theories Type: general – SubjectFull: Lifelong Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Needs Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Position Papers Type: general – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Theory Practice Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Trend Analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Andragogy Between Theory and Practice. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Klapan, Anita IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2002 |
| ResultId | 1 |