Tech Prep: Building a Framework for Future Research, Evaluation, and Program Practice. Focus Group Report.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Tech Prep: Building a Framework for Future Research, Evaluation, and Program Practice. Focus Group Report.
Language: English
Authors: Elliott, Barbara G., Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 60
Publication Date: 2000
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Vocational and Adult Education (ED), Washington, DC.
Contract Number: ED-99-CO-0160
Document Type: Opinion Papers
Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Articulation (Education), Data Collection, Employer Attitudes, Evaluation Criteria, Federal Legislation, Focus Groups, Methods Research, National Programs, Outcomes of Education, Postsecondary Education, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Research Needs, School Effectiveness, School Holding Power, Secondary Education, Student Evaluation, Tech Prep, Validated Programs
Geographic Terms: U.S.; North Carolina
Abstract: This document reports on three focus groups comprised of state officials, local practitioners and supporters, and researchers who were convened to provide input on strategies for assessing and validating the effects of tech prep. Part I provides a brief summary of the groups' discussions, including major points and broad themes in these four topic areas identified in a literature review: outcomes, measurement, how to define a tech prep student, and other design and data collection issues. The summary reports the following: (1) most agreed a national tech prep evaluation should focus on student outcomes but noted the program cannot impact students without first changing educational institutions; (2) a national evaluation should also consider these outcomes: participation and retention in secondary programs, transition to postsecondary education, and participation and retention in postsecondary programs; (3) measurement concerns included difficulty in tracking, delayed transition to postsecondary education, employer perspective in selecting student outcomes, and difficulty in defining a "program-related" career; (4) many believed a consensus definition for tech prep students that states could refine was reasonable; and (5) other design and data collection issues were the need to include input and contextual variables, how to coordinate a national evaluation with Perkins III requirements, relationship to state and local efforts, and state and local needs for technical assistance. Part II contains reports for each of the three focus groups, organized around the same four topics. (YLB)
Journal Code: RIESEP2003
Entry Date: 2003
Accession Number: ED472606
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED472606
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED472606
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Editorial & Opinion
PubTypeId: editorialOpinion
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Tech Prep: Building a Framework for Future Research, Evaluation, and Program Practice. Focus Group Report.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Elliott%2C+Barbara+G%2E%22">Elliott, Barbara G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Research+Triangle+Inst%2E%2C+Research+Triangle+Park%2C+NC%2E%22">Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 60
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2000
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Office of Vocational and Adult Education (ED), Washington, DC.
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: ED-99-CO-0160
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Opinion Papers<br />Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Articulation+%28Education%29%22">Articulation (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Collection%22">Data Collection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employer+Attitudes%22">Employer Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Focus+Groups%22">Focus Groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Methods+Research%22">Methods Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Programs%22">National Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Needs%22">Research Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Effectiveness%22">School Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Holding+Power%22">School Holding Power</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tech+Prep%22">Tech Prep</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validated+Programs%22">Validated Programs</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22U%2ES%2E%3B+North+Carolina%22">U.S.; North Carolina</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This document reports on three focus groups comprised of state officials, local practitioners and supporters, and researchers who were convened to provide input on strategies for assessing and validating the effects of tech prep. Part I provides a brief summary of the groups' discussions, including major points and broad themes in these four topic areas identified in a literature review: outcomes, measurement, how to define a tech prep student, and other design and data collection issues. The summary reports the following: (1) most agreed a national tech prep evaluation should focus on student outcomes but noted the program cannot impact students without first changing educational institutions; (2) a national evaluation should also consider these outcomes: participation and retention in secondary programs, transition to postsecondary education, and participation and retention in postsecondary programs; (3) measurement concerns included difficulty in tracking, delayed transition to postsecondary education, employer perspective in selecting student outcomes, and difficulty in defining a "program-related" career; (4) many believed a consensus definition for tech prep students that states could refine was reasonable; and (5) other design and data collection issues were the need to include input and contextual variables, how to coordinate a national evaluation with Perkins III requirements, relationship to state and local efforts, and state and local needs for technical assistance. Part II contains reports for each of the three focus groups, organized around the same four topics. (YLB)
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: Journal Code
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIESEP2003%22">RIESEP2003</searchLink>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2003
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED472606
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED472606
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 60
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Articulation (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data Collection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Employer Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Focus Groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Methods Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: National Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School Holding Power
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tech Prep
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Validated Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: U.S.; North Carolina
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Tech Prep: Building a Framework for Future Research, Evaluation, and Program Practice. Focus Group Report.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Elliott, Barbara G.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 2000
ResultId 1