Tech Prep: Building a Framework for Future Research, Evaluation, and Program Practice. Focus Group Report.
Saved in:
| Title: | Tech Prep: Building a Framework for Future Research, Evaluation, and Program Practice. Focus Group Report. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Elliott, Barbara G., Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 60 |
| Publication Date: | 2000 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Office of Vocational and Adult Education (ED), Washington, DC. |
| Contract Number: | ED-99-CO-0160 |
| Document Type: | Opinion Papers Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Articulation (Education), Data Collection, Employer Attitudes, Evaluation Criteria, Federal Legislation, Focus Groups, Methods Research, National Programs, Outcomes of Education, Postsecondary Education, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Research Needs, School Effectiveness, School Holding Power, Secondary Education, Student Evaluation, Tech Prep, Validated Programs |
| Geographic Terms: | U.S.; North Carolina |
| Abstract: | This document reports on three focus groups comprised of state officials, local practitioners and supporters, and researchers who were convened to provide input on strategies for assessing and validating the effects of tech prep. Part I provides a brief summary of the groups' discussions, including major points and broad themes in these four topic areas identified in a literature review: outcomes, measurement, how to define a tech prep student, and other design and data collection issues. The summary reports the following: (1) most agreed a national tech prep evaluation should focus on student outcomes but noted the program cannot impact students without first changing educational institutions; (2) a national evaluation should also consider these outcomes: participation and retention in secondary programs, transition to postsecondary education, and participation and retention in postsecondary programs; (3) measurement concerns included difficulty in tracking, delayed transition to postsecondary education, employer perspective in selecting student outcomes, and difficulty in defining a "program-related" career; (4) many believed a consensus definition for tech prep students that states could refine was reasonable; and (5) other design and data collection issues were the need to include input and contextual variables, how to coordinate a national evaluation with Perkins III requirements, relationship to state and local efforts, and state and local needs for technical assistance. Part II contains reports for each of the three focus groups, organized around the same four topics. (YLB) |
| Journal Code: | RIESEP2003 |
| Entry Date: | 2003 |
| Accession Number: | ED472606 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED472606 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED472606 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Editorial & Opinion PubTypeId: editorialOpinion PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Tech Prep: Building a Framework for Future Research, Evaluation, and Program Practice. Focus Group Report. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Elliott%2C+Barbara+G%2E%22">Elliott, Barbara G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Research+Triangle+Inst%2E%2C+Research+Triangle+Park%2C+NC%2E%22">Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 60 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2000 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Office of Vocational and Adult Education (ED), Washington, DC. – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: ED-99-CO-0160 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Opinion Papers<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Articulation+%28Education%29%22">Articulation (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Collection%22">Data Collection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employer+Attitudes%22">Employer Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Focus+Groups%22">Focus Groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Methods+Research%22">Methods Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Programs%22">National Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Needs%22">Research Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Effectiveness%22">School Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Holding+Power%22">School Holding Power</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tech+Prep%22">Tech Prep</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validated+Programs%22">Validated Programs</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22U%2ES%2E%3B+North+Carolina%22">U.S.; North Carolina</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This document reports on three focus groups comprised of state officials, local practitioners and supporters, and researchers who were convened to provide input on strategies for assessing and validating the effects of tech prep. Part I provides a brief summary of the groups' discussions, including major points and broad themes in these four topic areas identified in a literature review: outcomes, measurement, how to define a tech prep student, and other design and data collection issues. The summary reports the following: (1) most agreed a national tech prep evaluation should focus on student outcomes but noted the program cannot impact students without first changing educational institutions; (2) a national evaluation should also consider these outcomes: participation and retention in secondary programs, transition to postsecondary education, and participation and retention in postsecondary programs; (3) measurement concerns included difficulty in tracking, delayed transition to postsecondary education, employer perspective in selecting student outcomes, and difficulty in defining a "program-related" career; (4) many believed a consensus definition for tech prep students that states could refine was reasonable; and (5) other design and data collection issues were the need to include input and contextual variables, how to coordinate a national evaluation with Perkins III requirements, relationship to state and local efforts, and state and local needs for technical assistance. Part II contains reports for each of the three focus groups, organized around the same four topics. (YLB) – Name: CodeSource Label: Journal Code Group: SrcInfo Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIESEP2003%22">RIESEP2003</searchLink> – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2003 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED472606 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED472606 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 60 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Articulation (Education) Type: general – SubjectFull: Data Collection Type: general – SubjectFull: Employer Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation Type: general – SubjectFull: Focus Groups Type: general – SubjectFull: Methods Research Type: general – SubjectFull: National Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Needs Type: general – SubjectFull: School Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: School Holding Power Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Tech Prep Type: general – SubjectFull: Validated Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: U.S.; North Carolina Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Tech Prep: Building a Framework for Future Research, Evaluation, and Program Practice. Focus Group Report. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Elliott, Barbara G. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2000 |
| ResultId | 1 |