Guidelines for Review of Proposed University Campuses, Community Colleges, and Educational Centers. A Revision of the Commission's 1990 'Guidelines for Review of Proposed Campuses and Off-Campus Centers.' Commission Report.
Saved in:
| Title: | Guidelines for Review of Proposed University Campuses, Community Colleges, and Educational Centers. A Revision of the Commission's 1990 'Guidelines for Review of Proposed Campuses and Off-Campus Centers.' Commission Report. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento. |
| Availability: | For full text: http://www.cpec.ca.gov/CompleteReports/1992Reports/92-18.pdf. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 34 |
| Publication Date: | 1992 |
| Document Type: | Guides - Non-Classroom |
| Descriptors: | Campus Planning, Campuses, Community Colleges, Economic Impact, Economics of Education, Educational Complexes, Educational Policy, Planning, Public Policy, State Legislation, Strategic Planning, Two Year Colleges |
| Geographic Terms: | California |
| Abstract: | The California Postsecondary Commission must approve sites for new institutions or branches of public postsecondary educational institutions in the state of California. After a brief summary, this document presents revisions to the Commission's 1990 Guidelines for Review of Proposed Campuses and Off-Campus Centers. The 1990 guidelines called for a three-stage review concept: (1) statewide plan; (2) preliminary review; and (3) final review. The revised guidelines call for clarification of some requirements and procedures, including the following: (1) requirements for the statewide plan and letter of intent warrant greater clarification, particularly regarding the need for inter-system cooperation; (2) the 1990 guidelines assumed that a single set of procedures could be applied to all three public systems, while in practice there are major functional differences between the systems; and (3) over the years, the distinctions among terms such as college, center, and institution have become unclear and must be defined. This document offers detailed revisions to the guidelines that include (1) the systemwide long-range plan; (2) the letter of intent to expand; (3) the Commission's response to the letter of intent; (4) development of the needs study; and (5) commission action. The new guidelines also offer 10 criteria for evaluating proposals, including need, location, funding, and serving the disadvantaged. Appended are: (1) Guidelines for Review of Proposed Campuses and Off-Campus Centers (1990 Edition); and (2) Guide for Community College Districts Projection of Enrollment and Annual Average Weekly Contact Hours for New Colleges and Educational Centers. (NB) |
| Entry Date: | 2004 |
| Accession Number: | ED479185 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED479185 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED479185 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Electronic Resource PubTypeId: electronicResource PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Guidelines for Review of Proposed University Campuses, Community Colleges, and Educational Centers. A Revision of the Commission's 1990 'Guidelines for Review of Proposed Campuses and Off-Campus Centers.' Commission Report. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22California+State+Postsecondary+Education+Commission%2C+Sacramento%2E%22">California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento.</searchLink> – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: For full text: http://www.cpec.ca.gov/CompleteReports/1992Reports/92-18.pdf. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 34 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1992 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Guides - Non-Classroom – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Campus+Planning%22">Campus Planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Campuses%22">Campuses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+Colleges%22">Community Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Economic+Impact%22">Economic Impact</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Economics+of+Education%22">Economics of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Complexes%22">Educational Complexes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Planning%22">Planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Policy%22">Public Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Legislation%22">State Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Strategic+Planning%22">Strategic Planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Two+Year+Colleges%22">Two Year Colleges</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22California%22">California</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The California Postsecondary Commission must approve sites for new institutions or branches of public postsecondary educational institutions in the state of California. After a brief summary, this document presents revisions to the Commission's 1990 Guidelines for Review of Proposed Campuses and Off-Campus Centers. The 1990 guidelines called for a three-stage review concept: (1) statewide plan; (2) preliminary review; and (3) final review. The revised guidelines call for clarification of some requirements and procedures, including the following: (1) requirements for the statewide plan and letter of intent warrant greater clarification, particularly regarding the need for inter-system cooperation; (2) the 1990 guidelines assumed that a single set of procedures could be applied to all three public systems, while in practice there are major functional differences between the systems; and (3) over the years, the distinctions among terms such as college, center, and institution have become unclear and must be defined. This document offers detailed revisions to the guidelines that include (1) the systemwide long-range plan; (2) the letter of intent to expand; (3) the Commission's response to the letter of intent; (4) development of the needs study; and (5) commission action. The new guidelines also offer 10 criteria for evaluating proposals, including need, location, funding, and serving the disadvantaged. Appended are: (1) Guidelines for Review of Proposed Campuses and Off-Campus Centers (1990 Edition); and (2) Guide for Community College Districts Projection of Enrollment and Annual Average Weekly Contact Hours for New Colleges and Educational Centers. (NB) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2004 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED479185 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED479185 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Campus Planning Type: general – SubjectFull: Campuses Type: general – SubjectFull: Community Colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Economic Impact Type: general – SubjectFull: Economics of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Complexes Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Planning Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: State Legislation Type: general – SubjectFull: Strategic Planning Type: general – SubjectFull: Two Year Colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: California Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Guidelines for Review of Proposed University Campuses, Community Colleges, and Educational Centers. A Revision of the Commission's 1990 'Guidelines for Review of Proposed Campuses and Off-Campus Centers.' Commission Report. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 1992 |
| ResultId | 1 |
