A New Statistic for Evaluating Item Response Theory Models for Ordinal Data. CRESST Report 839

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A New Statistic for Evaluating Item Response Theory Models for Ordinal Data. CRESST Report 839
Language: English
Authors: Cai, Li, Monroe, Scott, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
Source: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). 2014.
Availability: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). 300 Charles E Young Drive N, GSE&IS Building 3rd Floor, Mailbox 951522, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1522. Tel: 310-206-1532; Fax: 310-825-3883; Web site: http://www.cresst.org
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 28
Publication Date: 2014
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DHHS/PHS)
Contract Number: R305D100039
R305B080016
R01DA026943
R01DA030466
Document Type: Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Goodness of Fit, Probability, Statistical Analysis, Outcome Measures, Measurement Techniques, Measurement, Statistics, Computation, Access to Information, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Statistical Distributions, Statistical Data, Tests, Error of Measurement, Evidence, Mathematical Applications, Evaluation Methods, Statistical Studies
Abstract: We propose a new limited-information goodness of fit test statistic C[subscript 2] for ordinal IRT models. The construction of the new statistic lies formally between the M[subscript 2] statistic of Maydeu-Olivares and Joe (2006), which utilizes first and second order marginal probabilities, and the M*[subscript 2] statistic of Cai and Hansen (2013), which collapses the marginal probabilities into means and product moments. Unlike M*[subscript 2], C[subscript 2] may be computed even when the number of items is small and the number of categories is large. It is as well calibrated as the alternatives and can be more powerful than M[subscript 2]. When all items are dichotomous, C[subscript 2] becomes equivalent to M*[subscript 2], which is also equivalent to M[subscript 2]. We analyze empirical data from a patient-reported outcomes measurement development project to illustrate the potential differences in substantive conclusions that one may draw from the use of different statistics for model fit assessment.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 20
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: ED555726
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:We propose a new limited-information goodness of fit test statistic C[subscript 2] for ordinal IRT models. The construction of the new statistic lies formally between the M[subscript 2] statistic of Maydeu-Olivares and Joe (2006), which utilizes first and second order marginal probabilities, and the M*[subscript 2] statistic of Cai and Hansen (2013), which collapses the marginal probabilities into means and product moments. Unlike M*[subscript 2], C[subscript 2] may be computed even when the number of items is small and the number of categories is large. It is as well calibrated as the alternatives and can be more powerful than M[subscript 2]. When all items are dichotomous, C[subscript 2] becomes equivalent to M*[subscript 2], which is also equivalent to M[subscript 2]. We analyze empirical data from a patient-reported outcomes measurement development project to illustrate the potential differences in substantive conclusions that one may draw from the use of different statistics for model fit assessment.