A New Statistic for Evaluating Item Response Theory Models for Ordinal Data. CRESST Report 839
Saved in:
| Title: | A New Statistic for Evaluating Item Response Theory Models for Ordinal Data. CRESST Report 839 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Cai, Li, Monroe, Scott, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing |
| Source: | National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). 2014. |
| Availability: | National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). 300 Charles E Young Drive N, GSE&IS Building 3rd Floor, Mailbox 951522, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1522. Tel: 310-206-1532; Fax: 310-825-3883; Web site: http://www.cresst.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 28 |
| Publication Date: | 2014 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED) National Institute on Drug Abuse (DHHS/PHS) |
| Contract Number: | R305D100039 R305B080016 R01DA026943 R01DA030466 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Item Response Theory, Models, Goodness of Fit, Probability, Statistical Analysis, Outcome Measures, Measurement Techniques, Measurement, Statistics, Computation, Access to Information, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Statistical Distributions, Statistical Data, Tests, Error of Measurement, Evidence, Mathematical Applications, Evaluation Methods, Statistical Studies |
| Abstract: | We propose a new limited-information goodness of fit test statistic C[subscript 2] for ordinal IRT models. The construction of the new statistic lies formally between the M[subscript 2] statistic of Maydeu-Olivares and Joe (2006), which utilizes first and second order marginal probabilities, and the M*[subscript 2] statistic of Cai and Hansen (2013), which collapses the marginal probabilities into means and product moments. Unlike M*[subscript 2], C[subscript 2] may be computed even when the number of items is small and the number of categories is large. It is as well calibrated as the alternatives and can be more powerful than M[subscript 2]. When all items are dichotomous, C[subscript 2] becomes equivalent to M*[subscript 2], which is also equivalent to M[subscript 2]. We analyze empirical data from a patient-reported outcomes measurement development project to illustrate the potential differences in substantive conclusions that one may draw from the use of different statistics for model fit assessment. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 20 |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| Entry Date: | 2015 |
| Accession Number: | ED555726 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED555726 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED555726 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A New Statistic for Evaluating Item Response Theory Models for Ordinal Data. CRESST Report 839 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cai%2C+Li%22">Cai, Li</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Monroe%2C+Scott%22">Monroe, Scott</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Center+for+Research+on+Evaluation%2C+Standards%2C+and+Student+Testing%22">National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Center+for+Research+on+Evaluation%2C+Standards%2C+and+Student+Testing+%28CRESST%29%22"><i>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</i></searchLink>. 2014. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). 300 Charles E Young Drive N, GSE&IS Building 3rd Floor, Mailbox 951522, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1522. Tel: 310-206-1532; Fax: 310-825-3883; Web site: http://www.cresst.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 28 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2014 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)<br />National Institute on Drug Abuse (DHHS/PHS) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: R305D100039<br />R305B080016<br />R01DA026943<br />R01DA030466 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Item+Response+Theory%22">Item Response Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Goodness+of+Fit%22">Goodness of Fit</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability%22">Probability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcome+Measures%22">Outcome Measures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement+Techniques%22">Measurement Techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement%22">Measurement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computation%22">Computation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+Information%22">Access to Information</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Maximum+Likelihood+Statistics%22">Maximum Likelihood Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Distributions%22">Statistical Distributions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Data%22">Statistical Data</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tests%22">Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+of+Measurement%22">Error of Measurement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence%22">Evidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+Applications%22">Mathematical Applications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Studies%22">Statistical Studies</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: We propose a new limited-information goodness of fit test statistic C[subscript 2] for ordinal IRT models. The construction of the new statistic lies formally between the M[subscript 2] statistic of Maydeu-Olivares and Joe (2006), which utilizes first and second order marginal probabilities, and the M*[subscript 2] statistic of Cai and Hansen (2013), which collapses the marginal probabilities into means and product moments. Unlike M*[subscript 2], C[subscript 2] may be computed even when the number of items is small and the number of categories is large. It is as well calibrated as the alternatives and can be more powerful than M[subscript 2]. When all items are dichotomous, C[subscript 2] becomes equivalent to M*[subscript 2], which is also equivalent to M[subscript 2]. We analyze empirical data from a patient-reported outcomes measurement development project to illustrate the potential differences in substantive conclusions that one may draw from the use of different statistics for model fit assessment. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 20 – Name: CodeSource Label: IES Funded Group: SrcInfo Data: Yes – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2015 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED555726 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED555726 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 28 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Item Response Theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Goodness of Fit Type: general – SubjectFull: Probability Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcome Measures Type: general – SubjectFull: Measurement Techniques Type: general – SubjectFull: Measurement Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Computation Type: general – SubjectFull: Access to Information Type: general – SubjectFull: Maximum Likelihood Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Distributions Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Data Type: general – SubjectFull: Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Error of Measurement Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematical Applications Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Studies Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A New Statistic for Evaluating Item Response Theory Models for Ordinal Data. CRESST Report 839 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cai, Li – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Monroe, Scott IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Type: published Y: 2014 Titles: – TitleFull: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |