Evaluation of Response to Intervention Practices for Elementary School Reading. Executive Summary. NCEE 2016-4000

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluation of Response to Intervention Practices for Elementary School Reading. Executive Summary. NCEE 2016-4000
Language: English
Authors: Balu, Rekha, Zhu, Pei, Doolittle, Fr, Schiller, Ellen, Jenkins, Joseph, Gersten, Russell, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED), MDRC
Source: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. 2015.
Availability: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Available from: ED Pubs. P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Tel: 877-433-7827; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2015
Contract Number: ED04CO0111/0003
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Primary Education
Early Childhood Education
Descriptors: Response to Intervention, Elementary School Students, Reading Instruction, Comparative Analysis, Incidence, Program Implementation, Program Effectiveness, Primary Education, Reading Achievement, Student Placement, Small Group Instruction, Reading Difficulties, Educational Policy
Abstract: Response to Intervention (RtI) is a framework for collecting and using data to match students to interventions of varying intensity. This study examines the implementation of RtI in Grade 1-3 reading in 13 states during the 2011-12 school year, focusing on 146 schools that were experienced with RtI. Full implementation of the RtI framework in Grade 1-3 reading was reported by 86 percent of the experienced schools. Fifty-five percent of these schools focused reading intervention services on Grade 1 students reading below grade level, while 45 percent of the schools also provided reading intervention services for Grade 1 students reading at or above grade level. Students who scored just below school-determined benchmarks on fall screening tests, and who were assigned to interventions for struggling readers, had lower spring reading scores in Grade 1 than students just above the threshold for intervention. In Grades 2 and 3, there were no statistically significant impacts of interventions for struggling readers on the spring reading scores of students just below the threshold for intervention. [Presented in this report is the executive summary of the study. For the full report "Evaluation of Response to Intervention Practices for Elementary School Reading. NCEE 2016-4000," see ED560820.]
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
IES Publication: https://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=NCEE20164000
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: ED560821
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Response to Intervention (RtI) is a framework for collecting and using data to match students to interventions of varying intensity. This study examines the implementation of RtI in Grade 1-3 reading in 13 states during the 2011-12 school year, focusing on 146 schools that were experienced with RtI. Full implementation of the RtI framework in Grade 1-3 reading was reported by 86 percent of the experienced schools. Fifty-five percent of these schools focused reading intervention services on Grade 1 students reading below grade level, while 45 percent of the schools also provided reading intervention services for Grade 1 students reading at or above grade level. Students who scored just below school-determined benchmarks on fall screening tests, and who were assigned to interventions for struggling readers, had lower spring reading scores in Grade 1 than students just above the threshold for intervention. In Grades 2 and 3, there were no statistically significant impacts of interventions for struggling readers on the spring reading scores of students just below the threshold for intervention. [Presented in this report is the executive summary of the study. For the full report "Evaluation of Response to Intervention Practices for Elementary School Reading. NCEE 2016-4000," see ED560820.]