Preservation Health Check: Monitoring Threats to Digital Repository Content
Saved in:
| Title: | Preservation Health Check: Monitoring Threats to Digital Repository Content |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Kool, Wouter, van der Werf, Titia, Lavoie, Brian, OCLC Research |
| Source: | OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. 2014. |
| Availability: | OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. 6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, OH 43017. Tel: 800-848-5878; Fax: 614-764-6096; e-mail: support@oclc.org; Web site: http://www.oclc.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 2014 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Information Storage, Metadata, Information Management, Computer Security, Program Evaluation, Preservation, Cost Effectiveness, Use Studies, Semantics, Dictionaries, Maps, Risk |
| ISBN: | 978-1-55653-472-0 |
| Abstract: | The Preservation Health Check (PHC) project, undertaken as a joint effort by Open Planets Foundation (OPF) and OCLC Research, aims to evaluate the usefulness of the preservation metadata created and maintained by operational repositories for assessing basic preservation properties. The PHC project seeks to develop an implementable logic to support preservation health checks of this kind, and to test this logic against the store of preservation metadata maintained by an operational preservation repository. Preservation metadata is often viewed as "contingency information" that is stored and maintained in the event of future need. The project goal was to explore the opportunities for using preservation metadata to support threat assessment exercises. The scope of the analysis is confined to establishing a general approach for using preservation metadata to support threat assessment, and to evaluating the utility of PREMIS preservation metadata as an evidence base for such assessments. The remainder of this paper provides background on the problem addressed by the PHC project, the approach for operationalizing the concept of a preservation health check, some preliminary findings, and next steps. |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 3 |
| Entry Date: | 2016 |
| Accession Number: | ED564813 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED564813 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED564813 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Preservation Health Check: Monitoring Threats to Digital Repository Content – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kool%2C+Wouter%22">Kool, Wouter</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+der+Werf%2C+Titia%22">van der Werf, Titia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lavoie%2C+Brian%22">Lavoie, Brian</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22OCLC+Research%22">OCLC Research</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22OCLC+Online+Computer+Library+Center%2C+Inc%22"><i>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc</i></searchLink>. 2014. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. 6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, OH 43017. Tel: 800-848-5878; Fax: 614-764-6096; e-mail: support@oclc.org; Web site: http://www.oclc.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 20 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2014 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+Storage%22">Information Storage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Metadata%22">Metadata</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+Management%22">Information Management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Security%22">Computer Security</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservation%22">Preservation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+Effectiveness%22">Cost Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Use+Studies%22">Use Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Semantics%22">Semantics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dictionaries%22">Dictionaries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Maps%22">Maps</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk%22">Risk</searchLink> – Name: ISBN Label: ISBN Group: ISBN Data: 978-1-55653-472-0 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The Preservation Health Check (PHC) project, undertaken as a joint effort by Open Planets Foundation (OPF) and OCLC Research, aims to evaluate the usefulness of the preservation metadata created and maintained by operational repositories for assessing basic preservation properties. The PHC project seeks to develop an implementable logic to support preservation health checks of this kind, and to test this logic against the store of preservation metadata maintained by an operational preservation repository. Preservation metadata is often viewed as "contingency information" that is stored and maintained in the event of future need. The project goal was to explore the opportunities for using preservation metadata to support threat assessment exercises. The scope of the analysis is confined to establishing a general approach for using preservation metadata to support threat assessment, and to evaluating the utility of PREMIS preservation metadata as an evidence base for such assessments. The remainder of this paper provides background on the problem addressed by the PHC project, the approach for operationalizing the concept of a preservation health check, some preliminary findings, and next steps. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 3 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2016 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED564813 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED564813 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Information Storage Type: general – SubjectFull: Metadata Type: general – SubjectFull: Information Management Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Security Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservation Type: general – SubjectFull: Cost Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Use Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Semantics Type: general – SubjectFull: Dictionaries Type: general – SubjectFull: Maps Type: general – SubjectFull: Risk Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Preservation Health Check: Monitoring Threats to Digital Repository Content Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: OCLC Research – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kool, Wouter – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: van der Werf, Titia – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lavoie, Brian IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2014 Identifiers: – Type: isbn-print Value: 978-1-55653-472-0 Titles: – TitleFull: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |