Preservice Teacher Mathematics Education: Online vs. Blended vs. Face to Face! Is This the Whole Story?
Saved in:
| Title: | Preservice Teacher Mathematics Education: Online vs. Blended vs. Face to Face! Is This the Whole Story? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Strang, Rebekah, Larkin, Kevin, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia |
| Source: | Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. 2018Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (41st, Auckland, New Zealand, 2018). |
| Availability: | Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. GPO Box 2747, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. Tel: +61-8-8363-0288; Fax: +61-8-8362-9288; e-mail: sales@merga.net.au; Web site: http://www.merga.net.au/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Document Type: | Speeches/Meeting Papers Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Preservice Teachers, Preservice Teacher Education, Mathematics Education, Online Courses, Blended Learning, Conventional Instruction, Mathematics Instruction, Curriculum Design, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Distance Education |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia |
| Abstract: | Negative experiences of university mathematics education are often laid at the feet of online or blended learning. However, data collected as part of a five-year project at two universities suggests that there is much more to consider in determining the quality of preservice teacher mathematics education courses. This paper outlines a methodology that investigates the experiences of pre-service education teachers (PSTs) in relation to their journey of learning how to teach primary mathematics delivered via a variety of modes. Results indicated that the mode of delivery is not the critical factor as course design, teacher knowledge, and building rapport seem to be more influential in student success. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2019 |
| Accession Number: | ED592489 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED592489 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED592489 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Conference PubTypeId: conference PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Preservice Teacher Mathematics Education: Online vs. Blended vs. Face to Face! Is This the Whole Story? – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Strang%2C+Rebekah%22">Strang, Rebekah</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Larkin%2C+Kevin%22">Larkin, Kevin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mathematics+Education+Research+Group+of+Australasia%22">Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Mathematics+Education+Research+Group+of+Australasia%22"><i>Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia</i></searchLink>. 2018Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (41st, Auckland, New Zealand, 2018). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. GPO Box 2747, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. Tel: +61-8-8363-0288; Fax: +61-8-8362-9288; e-mail: sales@merga.net.au; Web site: http://www.merga.net.au/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Speeches/Meeting Papers<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teachers%22">Preservice Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teacher+Education%22">Preservice Teacher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Education%22">Mathematics Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+Courses%22">Online Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blended+Learning%22">Blended Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conventional+Instruction%22">Conventional Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Instruction%22">Mathematics Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Design%22">Curriculum Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pedagogical+Content+Knowledge%22">Pedagogical Content Knowledge</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distance+Education%22">Distance Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Negative experiences of university mathematics education are often laid at the feet of online or blended learning. However, data collected as part of a five-year project at two universities suggests that there is much more to consider in determining the quality of preservice teacher mathematics education courses. This paper outlines a methodology that investigates the experiences of pre-service education teachers (PSTs) in relation to their journey of learning how to teach primary mathematics delivered via a variety of modes. Results indicated that the mode of delivery is not the critical factor as course design, teacher knowledge, and building rapport seem to be more influential in student success. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED592489 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED592489 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservice Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservice Teacher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Online Courses Type: general – SubjectFull: Blended Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Conventional Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Pedagogical Content Knowledge Type: general – SubjectFull: Distance Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Preservice Teacher Mathematics Education: Online vs. Blended vs. Face to Face! Is This the Whole Story? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Strang, Rebekah – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Larkin, Kevin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2018 Titles: – TitleFull: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |