View in EDS

End-of-Course Exams and Student Outcomes

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: End-of-Course Exams and Student Outcomes
Language: English
Authors: Tyner, Adam, Larsen, Matthew, Thomas B. Fordham Institute, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Source: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 2019.
Availability: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 1701 K Street NW Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-223-5452; Fax: 202-223-9226; e-mail: thegadfly@fordhaminstitute.org; Web site: https://fordhaminstitute.org/
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 44
Publication Date: 2019
Sponsoring Agency: Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: High School Students, Student Evaluation, Tests, Outcomes of Education, State Policy, Educational Policy, Graduation Rate, College Entrance Examinations, Scores, Educational History, Educational Trends, Mathematics Tests, Science Tests, English Instruction, Accountability, Academic Achievement, Educational Benefits, Mastery Learning, Competency Based Education
Abstract: Beginning in the late 1990s, many states took it upon themselves to institute end-of-course exams (EOCs) at the high school level, tests specifically designed to assess students' mastery of the content that various subject-matter courses covered. But was this testing policy good for students? "End-of-Course Exams and Student Outcomes," co-authored by Fordham's Adam Tyner and Matthew Larsen, an assistant professor of economics at Lafayette College, provides a rich longitudinal look at state policies related to EOCs over the past twenty years and the effects of administering EOCs in different subjects on high school graduation rates and college entrance exam scores. The study yielded five findings: (1) The use of EOCs increased dramatically starting in the late 1990s, but in the past few years has declined somewhat; (2) EOCs have been most widely used in math and science courses, but their use in English courses has risen fastest in the past decade; (3) Most states use EOCs for a mix of school and student accountability; (4) Unlike exit exams, EOCs are generally positively correlated with high school graduation rates; and (5) When analyzing EOCs by subject area, there is no statistically significant correlation with college entrance exam scores, but students in states with the most EOCs appear to outperform other students on these exams. The report includes three recommendations for state-level policymakers: (1) Embrace EOCs to leverage the potential benefits associated with external assessments without encountering the concerns raised about exit exams; (2) Consider building high school accountability systems around EOCs, given the suggestive evidence that they can help improve student outcomes; and (3) Use EOCs to encourage students to put more effort into their own studies, perhaps by linking them to graduation or including them in course grades or on report cards. The use of high-quality, content-linked external assessments could help push our education system toward mastery rather than seat time--a coveted goal, especially among advocates of competency-based and personalized models. That's unlikely to happen, however, in the absence of external measures that schools and employers can trust. Adroitly deployed, EOCs can play this role. [Foreword and executive summary by Chester E. Finn, Jr. and Amber M. Northern.]
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2019
Accession Number: ED598053
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED598053
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED598053
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: End-of-Course Exams and Student Outcomes
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tyner%2C+Adam%22">Tyner, Adam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Larsen%2C+Matthew%22">Larsen, Matthew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Institute%22">Thomas B. Fordham Institute</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Foundation%22">Thomas B. Fordham Foundation</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Institute%22"><i>Thomas B. Fordham Institute</i></searchLink>. 2019.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 1701 K Street NW Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-223-5452; Fax: 202-223-9226; e-mail: thegadfly@fordhaminstitute.org; Web site: https://fordhaminstitute.org/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 44
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2019
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tests%22">Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Policy%22">State Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduation+Rate%22">Graduation Rate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Entrance+Examinations%22">College Entrance Examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+History%22">Educational History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Trends%22">Educational Trends</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Tests%22">Mathematics Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Tests%22">Science Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+Instruction%22">English Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Benefits%22">Educational Benefits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mastery+Learning%22">Mastery Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competency+Based+Education%22">Competency Based Education</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Beginning in the late 1990s, many states took it upon themselves to institute end-of-course exams (EOCs) at the high school level, tests specifically designed to assess students' mastery of the content that various subject-matter courses covered. But was this testing policy good for students? "End-of-Course Exams and Student Outcomes," co-authored by Fordham's Adam Tyner and Matthew Larsen, an assistant professor of economics at Lafayette College, provides a rich longitudinal look at state policies related to EOCs over the past twenty years and the effects of administering EOCs in different subjects on high school graduation rates and college entrance exam scores. The study yielded five findings: (1) The use of EOCs increased dramatically starting in the late 1990s, but in the past few years has declined somewhat; (2) EOCs have been most widely used in math and science courses, but their use in English courses has risen fastest in the past decade; (3) Most states use EOCs for a mix of school and student accountability; (4) Unlike exit exams, EOCs are generally positively correlated with high school graduation rates; and (5) When analyzing EOCs by subject area, there is no statistically significant correlation with college entrance exam scores, but students in states with the most EOCs appear to outperform other students on these exams. The report includes three recommendations for state-level policymakers: (1) Embrace EOCs to leverage the potential benefits associated with external assessments without encountering the concerns raised about exit exams; (2) Consider building high school accountability systems around EOCs, given the suggestive evidence that they can help improve student outcomes; and (3) Use EOCs to encourage students to put more effort into their own studies, perhaps by linking them to graduation or including them in course grades or on report cards. The use of high-quality, content-linked external assessments could help push our education system toward mastery rather than seat time--a coveted goal, especially among advocates of competency-based and personalized models. That's unlikely to happen, however, in the absence of external measures that schools and employers can trust. Adroitly deployed, EOCs can play this role. [Foreword and executive summary by Chester E. Finn, Jr. and Amber M. Northern.]
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2019
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED598053
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED598053
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 44
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: High School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Graduation Rate
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Entrance Examinations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scores
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational History
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Trends
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Accountability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Benefits
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mastery Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Competency Based Education
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: End-of-Course Exams and Student Outcomes
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Thomas B. Fordham Institute
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tyner, Adam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Larsen, Matthew
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Thomas B. Fordham Institute
              Type: main
ResultId 1