School Turnaround in North Carolina: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis
Saved in:
| Title: | School Turnaround in North Carolina: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Heissel, Jennifer A., Ladd, Helen F. |
| Source: | Grantee Submission. 2018. |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 61 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED) |
| Contract Number: | R305C120008 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | School Turnaround, Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, Program Effectiveness, Outcomes of Education, Mathematics Achievement, Reading Achievement, Low Income Students, Faculty Development, Low Achievement, Principals, Educational Quality, Educational Improvement, Educational Legislation, Federal Aid, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs |
| Geographic Terms: | North Carolina |
| Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: | Race to the Top |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.08.001 |
| Abstract: | This paper examines the effect of a federally supported school turnaround program in North Carolina elementary and middle schools. Using a regression discontinuity design, we find that the turnaround program did not improve, and may have reduced, average school-level passing rates in math and reading. One potential contributor to that finding appears to be that the program increased the concentration of low-income students in treated schools. Based on teacher survey data, we find that, as was intended, treated schools brought in new principals and increased the time teachers devoted to professional development. At the same time, the program increased administrative burdens and distracted teachers, potentially reducing time available for instruction, and increased teacher turnover after the first full year of implementation. Overall, we find little evidence of success for North Carolina's efforts to turn around low-performing schools under its Race to the Top grant. [This paper was published in "Economics of Education Review" v62 p302-320 2018.] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| Entry Date: | 2022 |
| Accession Number: | ED619821 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | This paper examines the effect of a federally supported school turnaround program in North Carolina elementary and middle schools. Using a regression discontinuity design, we find that the turnaround program did not improve, and may have reduced, average school-level passing rates in math and reading. One potential contributor to that finding appears to be that the program increased the concentration of low-income students in treated schools. Based on teacher survey data, we find that, as was intended, treated schools brought in new principals and increased the time teachers devoted to professional development. At the same time, the program increased administrative burdens and distracted teachers, potentially reducing time available for instruction, and increased teacher turnover after the first full year of implementation. Overall, we find little evidence of success for North Carolina's efforts to turn around low-performing schools under its Race to the Top grant. [This paper was published in "Economics of Education Review" v62 p302-320 2018.] |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.08.001 |
