Turning Point for Digital Curricula: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2022

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Turning Point for Digital Curricula: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2022
Language: English
Authors: Seaman, Julia E., Seaman, Jeff, Bay View Analytics
Source: Bay View Analytics. 2022.
Availability: Bay View Analytics. 6924 Thornhill Drive, Oakland, CA 94611. Web site: https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/index.html
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 66
Publication Date: 2022
Sponsoring Agency: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Higher Education, Educational Technology, Preferences, Trend Analysis, College Faculty, Media Selection, Teacher Attitudes, Introductory Courses, Large Group Instruction, Minority Serving Institutions, Teacher Surveys, Teaching Methods, Pandemics, COVID-19, Educational Resources, Educational Trends, Technology Uses in Education, Costs, Accuracy, Educational Change, Open Educational Resources, Distance Education, Inclusion, Access to Education, Homework, Printed Materials, Textbooks, Electronic Publishing, Copyrights, Computer Assisted Instruction
Abstract: This study explores how faculty members select and use the educational materials employed in their courses. The primary sample represents all teaching faculty across all types of degree-granting higher education institution in the United States. Two subgroups of faculty are called out for detailed examination: those teaching large-enrollment introductory level courses, and those teaching at minority serving institutions. This survey, conducted in April 2022 and covering the 2021-22 academic year, surveyed 1,843 faculty and 916 administrators from U.S. higher education institutions. The respondents represent all 50 states and the District of Columbia. This survey asked faculty and teachers about their current teaching situation, opinions and preferences on digital materials and tools, and satisfaction with their current curricula. There are questions that continue to gauge the impact of the pandemic in higher education, and measure trends in the use of remote learning and digital tools that were adopted in response to the pandemic. Faculty were also asked to provide ratings for the curricula they use, both overall and for specific factors like cost and accuracy. Opinions are not universal. While trends point to increasingly digital classrooms, a small but sizeable group of faculty do not like or want digital materials. The full spectrum of preferences from faculty and administrators (and likely students) means a diverse range of curricula materials are expected to be adopted; publishers would do well to offer a suite of offerings, in order to address divergent demands. [For "Digital Texts in the Time of COVID: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2020," ED616838.]
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: ED622348
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study explores how faculty members select and use the educational materials employed in their courses. The primary sample represents all teaching faculty across all types of degree-granting higher education institution in the United States. Two subgroups of faculty are called out for detailed examination: those teaching large-enrollment introductory level courses, and those teaching at minority serving institutions. This survey, conducted in April 2022 and covering the 2021-22 academic year, surveyed 1,843 faculty and 916 administrators from U.S. higher education institutions. The respondents represent all 50 states and the District of Columbia. This survey asked faculty and teachers about their current teaching situation, opinions and preferences on digital materials and tools, and satisfaction with their current curricula. There are questions that continue to gauge the impact of the pandemic in higher education, and measure trends in the use of remote learning and digital tools that were adopted in response to the pandemic. Faculty were also asked to provide ratings for the curricula they use, both overall and for specific factors like cost and accuracy. Opinions are not universal. While trends point to increasingly digital classrooms, a small but sizeable group of faculty do not like or want digital materials. The full spectrum of preferences from faculty and administrators (and likely students) means a diverse range of curricula materials are expected to be adopted; publishers would do well to offer a suite of offerings, in order to address divergent demands. [For "Digital Texts in the Time of COVID: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2020," ED616838.]