Scaling up Teacher Induction: Implementation and Impact on Teachers and Students. Evaluation of the New Teacher Center's i3 Scale-Up Grant, Revised Final Report
Saved in:
| Title: | Scaling up Teacher Induction: Implementation and Impact on Teachers and Students. Evaluation of the New Teacher Center's i3 Scale-Up Grant, Revised Final Report |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Rebecca A. Schmidt, Aliya R. Pilchen, Katrina Laguarda, Haiwen Wang, Deepa Patel, SRI Education |
| Source: | SRI International. 2025. |
| Availability: | SRI International. 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025. Tel: 650-859-2000; e-mail: customer.service@sri.com; Web site: https://www.sri.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 100 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Office of Innovation and Improvement (ED), Investing in Innovation (i3) |
| Contract Number: | U411A15000515A |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education Elementary Education |
| Descriptors: | Beginning Teachers, Beginning Teacher Induction, Models, Coaching (Performance), Mentors, Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Persistence, Program Implementation, Fidelity, Mathematics Achievement, Middle School Mathematics, Language Arts, Elementary Schools, Elementary School Mathematics, Middle Schools, Poverty, Low Income Students |
| Abstract: | The purpose of this study was to understand the implementation and impact of the New Teacher Center's (NTC) strategies for scaling its validated induction model to 301 schools in five school districts serving high proportions of students of color and students from low-income households. SRI's evaluation of the implementation and impact of NTC's i3 scale-up grant employed a cluster randomized controlled trial design with schools as the unit of randomization. All first-year teachers in randomized schools were included in the study. Treatment teachers received induction supports from NTC-trained mentors, while control teachers received the supports provided by their districts under business-as-usual conditions. The evaluation examined fidelity of implementation to the model as designed, the contrast between the induction supports in the treatment and control conditions, and impacts on three key outcomes: 1) teachers' classroom practice as measured by the Danielson Framework for Teaching, 2) student achievement on state standardized assessments in mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) in grades 4 through 8, and 3) teacher retention within district. A previous version of this report was published in December 2020. This report provides updated information for review under WWC version 5.0 standards. See "2025 Report Updates" for a list of the changes made. NTC's induction model was not implemented with adequate fidelity in any of the five sites according to thresholds set by NTC, and the mentoring received by NTC treatment teachers was not substantially different in key respects from the mentoring received by control teachers. There were no statistically significant impacts of the model as implemented on overall teacher practice, student achievement, or teacher retention. Exploratory findings suggest conditions under which NTC might see a greater impact. There was a positive correlation between students' mathematics achievement and mentoring that met NTC's fidelity thresholds for frequency and duration, as well as between mathematics achievement and mentoring that met NTC's expectations for instructional focus. NTC induction supports also had a positive impact on student ELA achievement in schools with higher proportions of historically underserved students. These findings indicate the importance of ensuring high-quality implementation of a program. Under the i3 scale-up grant, NTC attempted to adapt its model for scaling, but the partner districts failed to fully implement key components and mediators as intended. There is evidence that the model has promise when fully implemented, particularly in schools with higher proportions of historically underserved students, but without further research this evidence is simply suggestive. The following are appended: references; the implementation fidelity matrix; survey item text and scale properties; supplementary, exploratory, and sensitivity analyses; and additional information for What Works Clearinghouse review. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED664805 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED664805 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED664805 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Scaling up Teacher Induction: Implementation and Impact on Teachers and Students. Evaluation of the New Teacher Center's i3 Scale-Up Grant, Revised Final Report – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rebecca+A%2E+Schmidt%22">Rebecca A. Schmidt</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aliya+R%2E+Pilchen%22">Aliya R. Pilchen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Katrina+Laguarda%22">Katrina Laguarda</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Haiwen+Wang%22">Haiwen Wang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deepa+Patel%22">Deepa Patel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22SRI+Education%22">SRI Education</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22SRI+International%22"><i>SRI International</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SRI International. 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025. Tel: 650-859-2000; e-mail: customer.service@sri.com; Web site: https://www.sri.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 100 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Office of Innovation and Improvement (ED), Investing in Innovation (i3) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: U411A15000515A – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Beginning+Teachers%22">Beginning Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Beginning+Teacher+Induction%22">Beginning Teacher Induction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Coaching+%28Performance%29%22">Coaching (Performance)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mentors%22">Mentors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Evaluation%22">Teacher Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Effectiveness%22">Teacher Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Persistence%22">Teacher Persistence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Implementation%22">Program Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fidelity%22">Fidelity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Achievement%22">Mathematics Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+School+Mathematics%22">Middle School Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Arts%22">Language Arts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Schools%22">Elementary Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+School+Mathematics%22">Elementary School Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Poverty%22">Poverty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Low+Income+Students%22">Low Income Students</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The purpose of this study was to understand the implementation and impact of the New Teacher Center's (NTC) strategies for scaling its validated induction model to 301 schools in five school districts serving high proportions of students of color and students from low-income households. SRI's evaluation of the implementation and impact of NTC's i3 scale-up grant employed a cluster randomized controlled trial design with schools as the unit of randomization. All first-year teachers in randomized schools were included in the study. Treatment teachers received induction supports from NTC-trained mentors, while control teachers received the supports provided by their districts under business-as-usual conditions. The evaluation examined fidelity of implementation to the model as designed, the contrast between the induction supports in the treatment and control conditions, and impacts on three key outcomes: 1) teachers' classroom practice as measured by the Danielson Framework for Teaching, 2) student achievement on state standardized assessments in mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) in grades 4 through 8, and 3) teacher retention within district. A previous version of this report was published in December 2020. This report provides updated information for review under WWC version 5.0 standards. See "2025 Report Updates" for a list of the changes made. NTC's induction model was not implemented with adequate fidelity in any of the five sites according to thresholds set by NTC, and the mentoring received by NTC treatment teachers was not substantially different in key respects from the mentoring received by control teachers. There were no statistically significant impacts of the model as implemented on overall teacher practice, student achievement, or teacher retention. Exploratory findings suggest conditions under which NTC might see a greater impact. There was a positive correlation between students' mathematics achievement and mentoring that met NTC's fidelity thresholds for frequency and duration, as well as between mathematics achievement and mentoring that met NTC's expectations for instructional focus. NTC induction supports also had a positive impact on student ELA achievement in schools with higher proportions of historically underserved students. These findings indicate the importance of ensuring high-quality implementation of a program. Under the i3 scale-up grant, NTC attempted to adapt its model for scaling, but the partner districts failed to fully implement key components and mediators as intended. There is evidence that the model has promise when fully implemented, particularly in schools with higher proportions of historically underserved students, but without further research this evidence is simply suggestive. The following are appended: references; the implementation fidelity matrix; survey item text and scale properties; supplementary, exploratory, and sensitivity analyses; and additional information for What Works Clearinghouse review. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED664805 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED664805 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 100 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Beginning Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Beginning Teacher Induction Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Coaching (Performance) Type: general – SubjectFull: Mentors Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Persistence Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Implementation Type: general – SubjectFull: Fidelity Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Middle School Mathematics Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Arts Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary School Mathematics Type: general – SubjectFull: Middle Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Poverty Type: general – SubjectFull: Low Income Students Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Scaling up Teacher Induction: Implementation and Impact on Teachers and Students. Evaluation of the New Teacher Center's i3 Scale-Up Grant, Revised Final Report Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: SRI Education – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rebecca A. Schmidt – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Aliya R. Pilchen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Katrina Laguarda – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Haiwen Wang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Deepa Patel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: SRI International Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |