Developing the Researcher Within

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Developing the Researcher Within
Language: English
Authors: Kyle Znamenak, Laura Holyoke
Source: American Association for Adult and Continuing Education. 2024.
Availability: American Association for Adult and Continuing Education. 10111 Martin Luther King Junior Highway Suite 200C, Bowie, MD 20720. Tel: 301-459-6261; Fax: 301-459-6241; e-mail: office@aaace.org; e-mail: aaace10@aol.com; Web site: http://www.aaace.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 6
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Reports - Research
Speeches/Meeting Papers
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Doctoral Programs, Comparative Analysis, College Credits, Doctoral Dissertations, Core Curriculum, Elective Courses, Experiential Learning, Graduation Requirements, Self Efficacy, Research Skills
Abstract: We examined a select group of R1 and R2 Doctor of Philosophy programs in education, focusing on core courses, research courses, dissertation structures, required credits, program structures, and experiential learning opportunities. A comparative analysis of ten institutions revealed commonalities in dissertation credit requirements but diverges in credit structuring, with R2 institutions offering more structured dissertation courses. R1 institutions emphasized core research courses, while R2 institutions provided increased flexibility through elective options. Despite the recognized benefits of enhancing research self-efficacy and skills, the implementation of structured experiential learning opportunities was inconsistent across programs. This study underscores the need for further research into how program structures influence long-term outcomes, such as publication success and career advancement. [For the full proceedings, see ED673719.]
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: ED673725
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:We examined a select group of R1 and R2 Doctor of Philosophy programs in education, focusing on core courses, research courses, dissertation structures, required credits, program structures, and experiential learning opportunities. A comparative analysis of ten institutions revealed commonalities in dissertation credit requirements but diverges in credit structuring, with R2 institutions offering more structured dissertation courses. R1 institutions emphasized core research courses, while R2 institutions provided increased flexibility through elective options. Despite the recognized benefits of enhancing research self-efficacy and skills, the implementation of structured experiential learning opportunities was inconsistent across programs. This study underscores the need for further research into how program structures influence long-term outcomes, such as publication success and career advancement. [For the full proceedings, see ED673719.]