How Much Mastery Is Enough Mastery? The Relationship between Mastery in a Lesson and the Performance on the Subsequent Lesson
Saved in:
| Title: | How Much Mastery Is Enough Mastery? The Relationship between Mastery in a Lesson and the Performance on the Subsequent Lesson |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jiayi Zhang, Kirk Vanacore, Ryan S. Baker, Nabil Ch, Caitlin Mills, Owen Henkel |
| Source: | International Educational Data Mining Society. 2025. |
| Availability: | International Educational Data Mining Society. e-mail: admin@educationaldatamining.org; Web site: https://educationaldatamining.org/conferences/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 7 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Speeches/Meeting Papers Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Elementary School Students, Junior High School Students, Mastery Learning, Teaching Methods, Competence, Bayesian Statistics, Artificial Intelligence, Mathematics Skills, Educational Technology, Electronic Learning, Skill Development |
| Abstract: | Mastery learning -- requiring students to achieve proficiency in a topic before advancing -- is a well-established and effective teaching method. Digital learning systems support this approach by personalizing content sequences, enabling students to focus on practicing topics they have not yet mastered. To achieve this, digital learning systems use knowledge tracing models, such as Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT), to estimate students' knowledge. The estimation is often converted into a binary indicator reflecting whether mastery has been achieved based on a predefined threshold (e.g. 0.95). Determining optimal thresholds is critical. While prior studies have identified thresholds to prevent over-practice on the same skill, it is equally important to examine how a student's degree of mastery predicts future learning on other skills, where prior mastery may facilitate acquiring new skills. The current study explores this relationship using data from Rori, an online tutoring system for foundational math skills. Using BKT, we categorized students' knowledge estimates at the end of each lesson (lesson N) into eight mastery levels and analyzed how the current mastery level is associated with students' future learning, measured by their performance, early and final knowledge estimates, and learning in the subsequent lesson (lesson N+1). Results indicate that while the widely adopted threshold of 0.95 remains relevant, higher thresholds, such as 0.98, yield additional benefits, including improved performance and learning in subsequent lessons. These findings provide empirical insights for designing adaptive learning technologies that enhance personalization, efficiency, and support for future learning. [For the complete proceedings, see ED675583.] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED675652 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED675652 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED675652 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Conference PubTypeId: conference PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How Much Mastery Is Enough Mastery? The Relationship between Mastery in a Lesson and the Performance on the Subsequent Lesson – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jiayi+Zhang%22">Jiayi Zhang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kirk+Vanacore%22">Kirk Vanacore</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ryan+S%2E+Baker%22">Ryan S. Baker</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nabil+Ch%22">Nabil Ch</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Caitlin+Mills%22">Caitlin Mills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Owen+Henkel%22">Owen Henkel</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Educational+Data+Mining+Society%22"><i>International Educational Data Mining Society</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: International Educational Data Mining Society. e-mail: admin@educationaldatamining.org; Web site: https://educationaldatamining.org/conferences/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 7 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Speeches/Meeting Papers<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+School+Students%22">Elementary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Junior+High+School+Students%22">Junior High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mastery+Learning%22">Mastery Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competence%22">Competence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bayesian+Statistics%22">Bayesian Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Skills%22">Mathematics Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+Learning%22">Electronic Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Skill+Development%22">Skill Development</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Mastery learning -- requiring students to achieve proficiency in a topic before advancing -- is a well-established and effective teaching method. Digital learning systems support this approach by personalizing content sequences, enabling students to focus on practicing topics they have not yet mastered. To achieve this, digital learning systems use knowledge tracing models, such as Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT), to estimate students' knowledge. The estimation is often converted into a binary indicator reflecting whether mastery has been achieved based on a predefined threshold (e.g. 0.95). Determining optimal thresholds is critical. While prior studies have identified thresholds to prevent over-practice on the same skill, it is equally important to examine how a student's degree of mastery predicts future learning on other skills, where prior mastery may facilitate acquiring new skills. The current study explores this relationship using data from Rori, an online tutoring system for foundational math skills. Using BKT, we categorized students' knowledge estimates at the end of each lesson (lesson N) into eight mastery levels and analyzed how the current mastery level is associated with students' future learning, measured by their performance, early and final knowledge estimates, and learning in the subsequent lesson (lesson N+1). Results indicate that while the widely adopted threshold of 0.95 remains relevant, higher thresholds, such as 0.98, yield additional benefits, including improved performance and learning in subsequent lessons. These findings provide empirical insights for designing adaptive learning technologies that enhance personalization, efficiency, and support for future learning. [For the complete proceedings, see ED675583.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED675652 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED675652 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Elementary School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Junior High School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Mastery Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Competence Type: general – SubjectFull: Bayesian Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Skill Development Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How Much Mastery Is Enough Mastery? The Relationship between Mastery in a Lesson and the Performance on the Subsequent Lesson Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jiayi Zhang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kirk Vanacore – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ryan S. Baker – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nabil Ch – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Caitlin Mills – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Owen Henkel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: International Educational Data Mining Society Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |