Avoiding the Supreme Court's Religious Charter-School Trap: Governance Change for the New Legal Era
Saved in:
| Title: | Avoiding the Supreme Court's Religious Charter-School Trap: Governance Change for the New Legal Era |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Kevin G. Welner, Carol C. Burris, Preston C. Green III, University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center (NEPC) |
| Source: | National Education Policy Center. 2026. |
| Availability: | National Education Policy Center. School of Education 249 UCB University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. Tel: 303-735-5290; e-mail: nepc@colorado.edu; Web site: http://nepc.colorado.edu |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 33 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Court Litigation, Religious Schools, Charter Schools, Governance, Legal Problems, Educational Finance, Educational Change, Constitutional Law, State Policy, State Church Separation, Religious Discrimination, Accountability, Financial Audits |
| Abstract: | Forty-six states and the District of Columbia permit charter schools to open, and 33 states plus D.C. allow independently governed charter schools that the Supreme Court may soon declare to be non-state actors not bound by constitutional obligations. This could create major legal tensions, as states may be unable to exclude religious charter schools from public funding while also losing the ability to enforce constitutional protections against discrimination and government establishment of religion. The issue stems from the Supreme Court's increasing willingness to require states to fund religious institutions on equal terms with secular ones, potentially opening the door to publicly funded religious charter schools. States with independently governed charters could face heightened constitutional risk, while those with district-governed charter systems may be better positioned to preserve charter schools' public character and oversight. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | ED681114 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED681114 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED681114 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Avoiding the Supreme Court's Religious Charter-School Trap: Governance Change for the New Legal Era – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kevin+G%2E+Welner%22">Kevin G. Welner</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Carol+C%2E+Burris%22">Carol C. Burris</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Preston+C%2E+Green+III%22">Preston C. Green III</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22University+of+Colorado+at+Boulder%2C+National+Education+Policy+Center+%28NEPC%29%22">University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center (NEPC)</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Education+Policy+Center%22"><i>National Education Policy Center</i></searchLink>. 2026. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National Education Policy Center. School of Education 249 UCB University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. Tel: 303-735-5290; e-mail: nepc@colorado.edu; Web site: http://nepc.colorado.edu – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 33 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Court+Litigation%22">Court Litigation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Religious+Schools%22">Religious Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Charter+Schools%22">Charter Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Governance%22">Governance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legal+Problems%22">Legal Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Finance%22">Educational Finance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Constitutional+Law%22">Constitutional Law</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Policy%22">State Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Church+Separation%22">State Church Separation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Religious+Discrimination%22">Religious Discrimination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Financial+Audits%22">Financial Audits</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Forty-six states and the District of Columbia permit charter schools to open, and 33 states plus D.C. allow independently governed charter schools that the Supreme Court may soon declare to be non-state actors not bound by constitutional obligations. This could create major legal tensions, as states may be unable to exclude religious charter schools from public funding while also losing the ability to enforce constitutional protections against discrimination and government establishment of religion. The issue stems from the Supreme Court's increasing willingness to require states to fund religious institutions on equal terms with secular ones, potentially opening the door to publicly funded religious charter schools. States with independently governed charters could face heightened constitutional risk, while those with district-governed charter systems may be better positioned to preserve charter schools' public character and oversight. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED681114 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED681114 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 33 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Court Litigation Type: general – SubjectFull: Religious Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Charter Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Governance Type: general – SubjectFull: Legal Problems Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Finance Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Constitutional Law Type: general – SubjectFull: State Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: State Church Separation Type: general – SubjectFull: Religious Discrimination Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Financial Audits Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Avoiding the Supreme Court's Religious Charter-School Trap: Governance Change for the New Legal Era Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center (NEPC) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kevin G. Welner – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Carol C. Burris – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Preston C. Green III IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Type: published Y: 2026 Titles: – TitleFull: National Education Policy Center Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |