NEPC Review: 'Outmatched: Special Education Can't Solve Problems Rooted in the Education Delivery System' (Center on Reinventing Public Education, October 2025)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: NEPC Review: 'Outmatched: Special Education Can't Solve Problems Rooted in the Education Delivery System' (Center on Reinventing Public Education, October 2025)
Language: English
Authors: Federico R. Waitoller, University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center (NEPC)
Source: National Education Policy Center. 2026.
Availability: National Education Policy Center. School of Education 249 UCB University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. Tel: 303-735-5290; e-mail: nepc@colorado.edu; Web site: http://nepc.colorado.edu
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 13
Publication Date: 2026
Sponsoring Agency: Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice
Document Type: Reports - Evaluative
Opinion Papers
Descriptors: Special Education, Students with Disabilities, Educational Trends, Disability Identification, Educational Legislation, Equal Education, Federal Legislation, Achievement Gap, Educational Needs, Research Methodology, Misconceptions, Psychological Evaluation, Accountability, Educational Quality, Student Rights
Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Abstract: While special education in the U.S. has made significant achievements in terms of civil rights and educational equity, many critics have identified inequities in terms of labeling, segregation, and low academic expectations. A new report published by the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) opens an initiative to restructure special education. It argues that increased special education identifications and persistent achievement gaps reflect the failure of a general education system built for uniformity rather than diversity. It concludes that, as a result of this uniformity, special education serves as a default mechanism for unmet instructional needs, and it calls for replacing the dual general/special education structure with a unified, needs-based system. The report, however, has several major weaknesses. Its rationale rests on broad claims about systemic design flaws, but it provides only limited descriptive statistics and selectively uses research literature. Moreover, while the report accurately identifies very real problems, such as reliance on psychological evaluations and inequitable access to services, it provides no empirical evidence linking these systemic features to rising identification rates or widening achievement gaps. Also, because it only selectively uses research, it overlooks decades of scholarship on identification, disproportionality, and system design, while failing to engage with counterarguments that defend special education as a necessary specialized system. The report's recommendations are bold but are not empirically grounded, leaving unanswered questions about legal protections, expertise, accountability, and instructional quality for students with disabilities. As such, this report provides little direct guidance for developing or revising policy in ways that would reliably safeguard the rights and learning needs of students with disabilities.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: ED681179
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED681179
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED681179
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: NEPC Review: 'Outmatched: Special Education Can't Solve Problems Rooted in the Education Delivery System' (Center on Reinventing Public Education, October 2025)
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Federico+R%2E+Waitoller%22">Federico R. Waitoller</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22University+of+Colorado+at+Boulder%2C+National+Education+Policy+Center+%28NEPC%29%22">University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center (NEPC)</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Education+Policy+Center%22"><i>National Education Policy Center</i></searchLink>. 2026.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: National Education Policy Center. School of Education 249 UCB University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. Tel: 303-735-5290; e-mail: nepc@colorado.edu; Web site: http://nepc.colorado.edu
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 13
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Evaluative<br />Opinion Papers
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Special+Education%22">Special Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students+with+Disabilities%22">Students with Disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Trends%22">Educational Trends</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disability+Identification%22">Disability Identification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Legislation%22">Educational Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equal+Education%22">Equal Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Gap%22">Achievement Gap</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Needs%22">Educational Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Methodology%22">Research Methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Misconceptions%22">Misconceptions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+Evaluation%22">Psychological Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Quality%22">Educational Quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Rights%22">Student Rights</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Individuals+with+Disabilities+Education+Act%22">Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: While special education in the U.S. has made significant achievements in terms of civil rights and educational equity, many critics have identified inequities in terms of labeling, segregation, and low academic expectations. A new report published by the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) opens an initiative to restructure special education. It argues that increased special education identifications and persistent achievement gaps reflect the failure of a general education system built for uniformity rather than diversity. It concludes that, as a result of this uniformity, special education serves as a default mechanism for unmet instructional needs, and it calls for replacing the dual general/special education structure with a unified, needs-based system. The report, however, has several major weaknesses. Its rationale rests on broad claims about systemic design flaws, but it provides only limited descriptive statistics and selectively uses research literature. Moreover, while the report accurately identifies very real problems, such as reliance on psychological evaluations and inequitable access to services, it provides no empirical evidence linking these systemic features to rising identification rates or widening achievement gaps. Also, because it only selectively uses research, it overlooks decades of scholarship on identification, disproportionality, and system design, while failing to engage with counterarguments that defend special education as a necessary specialized system. The report's recommendations are bold but are not empirically grounded, leaving unanswered questions about legal protections, expertise, accountability, and instructional quality for students with disabilities. As such, this report provides little direct guidance for developing or revising policy in ways that would reliably safeguard the rights and learning needs of students with disabilities.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED681179
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED681179
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Special Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Students with Disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Trends
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disability Identification
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Equal Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Achievement Gap
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Misconceptions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Accountability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Quality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Rights
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: NEPC Review: 'Outmatched: Special Education Can't Solve Problems Rooted in the Education Delivery System' (Center on Reinventing Public Education, October 2025)
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center (NEPC)
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Federico R. Waitoller
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: National Education Policy Center
              Type: main
ResultId 1