Lessons Learned from Research about Informal Reading Inventories: Keys to Data-Driven Instructional Recommendations
Saved in:
| Title: | Lessons Learned from Research about Informal Reading Inventories: Keys to Data-Driven Instructional Recommendations |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | L'Allier, Susan K. |
| Source: | Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2013 29(3):288-307. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 2013 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Informal Reading Inventories, Data, Decision Making, Reading Instruction, Graduate Students, Teacher Education, Literacy Education, Expertise, Comparative Analysis, Educational Strategies, Miscue Analysis, Reading Rate, Inferences, Silent Reading, Evaluation Utilization |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Basic Reading Inventory |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10573569.2013.789780 |
| ISSN: | 1057-3569 |
| Abstract: | This study examined how effectively candidates in an MSEd in literacy education with a focus on reading program used the results from the Basic Reading Inventory to develop key instructional recommendations. The results indicated that, overall, candidates made about two thirds of the key recommendations suggested by an expert in the area of reading and reading assessment. Candidates needed to increase the specificity of strategies related to the recommendations and to decrease the number of low-priority recommendations. This article delineates suggestions regarding how teacher educators can help their candidates improve the quality and specificity of recommendations. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 25 |
| Entry Date: | 2014 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1012384 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1012384 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Lessons Learned from Research about Informal Reading Inventories: Keys to Data-Driven Instructional Recommendations – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22L'Allier%2C+Susan+K%2E%22">L'Allier, Susan K.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Reading+%26+Writing+Quarterly%22"><i>Reading & Writing Quarterly</i></searchLink>. 2013 29(3):288-307. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 20 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2013 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Informal+Reading+Inventories%22">Informal Reading Inventories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data%22">Data</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Instruction%22">Reading Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Education%22">Teacher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literacy+Education%22">Literacy Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expertise%22">Expertise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Strategies%22">Educational Strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Miscue+Analysis%22">Miscue Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Rate%22">Reading Rate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inferences%22">Inferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Silent+Reading%22">Silent Reading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Utilization%22">Evaluation Utilization</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Basic+Reading+Inventory%22">Basic Reading Inventory</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/10573569.2013.789780 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1057-3569 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examined how effectively candidates in an MSEd in literacy education with a focus on reading program used the results from the Basic Reading Inventory to develop key instructional recommendations. The results indicated that, overall, candidates made about two thirds of the key recommendations suggested by an expert in the area of reading and reading assessment. Candidates needed to increase the specificity of strategies related to the recommendations and to decrease the number of low-priority recommendations. This article delineates suggestions regarding how teacher educators can help their candidates improve the quality and specificity of recommendations. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 25 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2014 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1012384 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1012384 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/10573569.2013.789780 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 StartPage: 288 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Informal Reading Inventories Type: general – SubjectFull: Data Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Literacy Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Expertise Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Miscue Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Rate Type: general – SubjectFull: Inferences Type: general – SubjectFull: Silent Reading Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Utilization Type: general – SubjectFull: Basic Reading Inventory Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Lessons Learned from Research about Informal Reading Inventories: Keys to Data-Driven Instructional Recommendations Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: L'Allier, Susan K. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2013 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1057-3569 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 29 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Reading & Writing Quarterly Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |