Modes of Modelling Assessment--A Literature Review

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Modes of Modelling Assessment--A Literature Review
Language: English
Authors: Frejd, Peter
Source: Educational Studies in Mathematics. Nov 2013 84(3):413-438.
Availability: Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2013
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Mathematics Tests, Models, Literature Reviews, Educational Assessment, Holistic Evaluation, Competence, Barriers, Reliability, Student Projects, Criteria, Educational Quality
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-013-9491-5
ISSN: 0013-1954
Abstract: This paper presents a critical review of literature investigating assessment of mathematical modelling. Written tests, projects, hands-on tests, portfolio and contests are modes of modelling assessment identified in this study. The written tests found in the reviewed papers draw on an atomistic view on modelling competencies, whereas projects are described to assess a more holistic modelling competence but obstacles regarding reliability of assessing projects are identified. The outcome of this investigation also indicates that the criteria used in frameworks or modes of assessment seldom are derived from a theoretical analysis, but more often based on ad hoc constructions, experience from assessment situations or empirical studies of students' work. Finally, this study suggests that an elaborated view on the meaning of quality of mathematical models is needed in order to assess the quality of students' work with mathematical models.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 89
Entry Date: 2014
Accession Number: EJ1036720
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This paper presents a critical review of literature investigating assessment of mathematical modelling. Written tests, projects, hands-on tests, portfolio and contests are modes of modelling assessment identified in this study. The written tests found in the reviewed papers draw on an atomistic view on modelling competencies, whereas projects are described to assess a more holistic modelling competence but obstacles regarding reliability of assessing projects are identified. The outcome of this investigation also indicates that the criteria used in frameworks or modes of assessment seldom are derived from a theoretical analysis, but more often based on ad hoc constructions, experience from assessment situations or empirical studies of students' work. Finally, this study suggests that an elaborated view on the meaning of quality of mathematical models is needed in order to assess the quality of students' work with mathematical models.
ISSN:0013-1954
DOI:10.1007/s10649-013-9491-5