Can an Expanded Interpretation of Phronesis Support Teacher Professional Development for Inclusion?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Can an Expanded Interpretation of Phronesis Support Teacher Professional Development for Inclusion?
Language: English
Authors: Florian, Lani, Graham, Archie
Source: Cambridge Journal of Education. 2014 44(4):465-478.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2014
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Inclusion, Teaching Methods, Decision Making, Teacher Education, Educational Philosophy, Ethics
DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2014.960910
ISSN: 0305-764X
Abstract: This paper presents an overview of the concept of inclusive pedagogy, conceptualised as an approach to teaching that focuses on extending what is generally available to everyone (as opposed to providing for all by differentiating for some) while taking into account that there will be differences between learners. It considers the concept of phronesis as a tool for exploring questions about teacher decision-making in relation to inclusive pedagogy and how phronesis might be taught. To this end, we review some of the ways in which phronesis has been used in teacher education, and consider the potential of broadening the term based on a Heideggerian rather than Aristotelian conceptualisation of it. We consider whether this broader conceptualisation may help to facilitate the development of teachers to understand the limitations inherent in traditional approaches to learner difference and adopt an inclusive pedagogical approach instead.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 37
Entry Date: 2014
Accession Number: EJ1045425
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:This paper presents an overview of the concept of inclusive pedagogy, conceptualised as an approach to teaching that focuses on extending what is generally available to everyone (as opposed to providing for all by differentiating for some) while taking into account that there will be differences between learners. It considers the concept of phronesis as a tool for exploring questions about teacher decision-making in relation to inclusive pedagogy and how phronesis might be taught. To this end, we review some of the ways in which phronesis has been used in teacher education, and consider the potential of broadening the term based on a Heideggerian rather than Aristotelian conceptualisation of it. We consider whether this broader conceptualisation may help to facilitate the development of teachers to understand the limitations inherent in traditional approaches to learner difference and adopt an inclusive pedagogical approach instead.
ISSN:0305-764X
DOI:10.1080/0305764X.2014.960910