View in EDS

Children's Health in a Legal Framework

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Children's Health in a Legal Framework
Language: English
Authors: Huntington, Clare, Scott, Elizabeth
Source: Future of Children. Spr 2015 25(1):177-197.
Availability: Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and The Brookings Institution. 267 Wallace Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544. Tel: 609-258-6979; e-mail: FOC@princeton.edu; Web site: http://futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 21
Publication Date: 2015
Intended Audience: Policymakers; Researchers
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Child Health, Legal Responsibility, Health Promotion, Parent Responsibility, Parent Rights, Decision Making, Medical Services, Child Welfare, Government Role, Public Policy, Child Rearing, Children, Adolescents, Policy Formation, Well Being, Age Differences, Sex Education, Court Litigation, Juvenile Justice
Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: Childrens Health Insurance Program
ISSN: 1054-8289
Abstract: The U.S. legal system gives parents the authority and responsibility to make decisions about their children's health care, and favors parental rights over society's collective responsibility to provide for children's welfare. Neither the federal government nor state governments have an affirmative obligation to protect and promote children's health, nor do children have a right to such protection. In this sense, write Clare Huntington and Elizabeth Scott, policies to promote child health in this country, such as those discussed elsewhere in this issue, are optional. Our libertarian legal framework grants parents broad authority to raise their children as they see fit. Parents can refuse recommended medical treatment for their children, and when they do so, courts respond with deference, particularly when parents' objections are based on religious beliefs. Parental authority has its limits, however. For example, the government can intervene to protect children's welfare in cases of medical neglect or when the child's life is in danger. Additionally, the law sometimes limits parental authority over older children. For example, teenagers may be able to refuse some treatments, such as psychiatric hospitalization, over their parents' objections. Older minors may also have access to treatments such as family planning services without their parents' consent. Because the government has no positive obligation to promote children's health, write Huntington and Scott, children's health programs are often underfunded and vulnerable to political pressure. Programs are also more likely to focus on responding to family crises than on helping parents raise healthy children. In this environment, policy makers, researchers, and advocates must build political support by showing that investments in children's health not only benefit children but also promote social welfare.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: EJ1062948
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1062948
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1062948
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Children's Health in a Legal Framework
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huntington%2C+Clare%22">Huntington, Clare</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scott%2C+Elizabeth%22">Scott, Elizabeth</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Future+of+Children%22"><i>Future of Children</i></searchLink>. Spr 2015 25(1):177-197.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and The Brookings Institution. 267 Wallace Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544. Tel: 609-258-6979; e-mail: FOC@princeton.edu; Web site: http://futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/journals
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 21
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2015
– Name: Audience
  Label: Intended Audience
  Group: Audnce
  Data: Policymakers; Researchers
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Child+Health%22">Child Health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legal+Responsibility%22">Legal Responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+Promotion%22">Health Promotion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parent+Responsibility%22">Parent Responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parent+Rights%22">Parent Rights</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+Services%22">Medical Services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Child+Welfare%22">Child Welfare</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+Role%22">Government Role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Policy%22">Public Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Child+Rearing%22">Child Rearing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Children%22">Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adolescents%22">Adolescents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Formation%22">Policy Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Well+Being%22">Well Being</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Age+Differences%22">Age Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+Education%22">Sex Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Court+Litigation%22">Court Litigation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Juvenile+Justice%22">Juvenile Justice</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Childrens+Health+Insurance+Program%22">Childrens Health Insurance Program</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1054-8289
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The U.S. legal system gives parents the authority and responsibility to make decisions about their children's health care, and favors parental rights over society's collective responsibility to provide for children's welfare. Neither the federal government nor state governments have an affirmative obligation to protect and promote children's health, nor do children have a right to such protection. In this sense, write Clare Huntington and Elizabeth Scott, policies to promote child health in this country, such as those discussed elsewhere in this issue, are optional. Our libertarian legal framework grants parents broad authority to raise their children as they see fit. Parents can refuse recommended medical treatment for their children, and when they do so, courts respond with deference, particularly when parents' objections are based on religious beliefs. Parental authority has its limits, however. For example, the government can intervene to protect children's welfare in cases of medical neglect or when the child's life is in danger. Additionally, the law sometimes limits parental authority over older children. For example, teenagers may be able to refuse some treatments, such as psychiatric hospitalization, over their parents' objections. Older minors may also have access to treatments such as family planning services without their parents' consent. Because the government has no positive obligation to promote children's health, write Huntington and Scott, children's health programs are often underfunded and vulnerable to political pressure. Programs are also more likely to focus on responding to family crises than on helping parents raise healthy children. In this environment, policy makers, researchers, and advocates must build political support by showing that investments in children's health not only benefit children but also promote social welfare.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2015
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1062948
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1062948
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 177
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Child Health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Legal Responsibility
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health Promotion
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Parent Responsibility
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Parent Rights
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decision Making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical Services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Child Welfare
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Government Role
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Child Rearing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adolescents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Policy Formation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Well Being
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Age Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sex Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Court Litigation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Juvenile Justice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Childrens Health Insurance Program
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Children's Health in a Legal Framework
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Huntington, Clare
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Scott, Elizabeth
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2015
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1054-8289
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 25
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Future of Children
              Type: main
ResultId 1