Academic Achievement among Juvenile Detainees

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Academic Achievement among Juvenile Detainees
Language: English
Authors: Grigorenko, Elena L., Macomber, Donna, Hart, Lesley, Naples, Adam, Chapman, John, Geib, Catherine F., Chart, Hilary, Tan, Mei, Wolhendler, Baruch, Wagner, Richard
Source: Journal of Learning Disabilities. Jul-Aug 2015 48(4):359-368.
Availability: SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 10
Publication Date: 2015
Sponsoring Agency: National Institutes of Health (DHHS)
Contract Number: HD052120
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Juvenile Justice, Statistical Analysis, Qualitative Research, Reading Skills, Mathematics Skills, Learning Disabilities, Correlation, Institutionalized Persons, Classification, Mental Retardation, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Developmental Disabilities, Severity (of Disability), Screening Tests, Placement, Language Arts, State Standards, Youth, Mathematics Tests, Reading Tests, Scores
Geographic Terms: Connecticut
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Wide Range Achievement Test
DOI: 10.1177/0022219413500991
ISSN: 0022-2194
Abstract: The literature has long pointed to heightened frequencies of learning disabilities (LD) within the population of law offenders; however, a systematic appraisal of these observations, careful estimation of these frequencies, and investigation of their correlates and causes have been lacking. Here we present data collected from all youth (1,337 unique admissions, mean age 14.81, 20.3% females) placed in detention in Connecticut (January 1, 2010-July 1, 2011). All youth completed a computerized educational screener designed to test a range of performance in reading (word and text levels) and mathematics. A subsample (n = 410) received the "Wide Range Achievement Test," in addition to the educational screener. Quantitative (scale-based) and qualitative (grade-equivalence-based) indicators were then analyzed for both assessments. Results established the range of LD in this sample from 13% to 40%, averaging 24.9%. This work provides a systematic exploration of the type and severity of word and text reading and mathematics skill deficiencies among juvenile detainees and builds the foundation for subsequent efforts that may link these deficiencies to both more formal, structured, and variable definitions and classifications of LD, and to other types of disabilities (e.g., intellectual disability) and developmental disorders (e.g., ADHD) that need to be conducted in future research.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 59
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: EJ1064348
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:The literature has long pointed to heightened frequencies of learning disabilities (LD) within the population of law offenders; however, a systematic appraisal of these observations, careful estimation of these frequencies, and investigation of their correlates and causes have been lacking. Here we present data collected from all youth (1,337 unique admissions, mean age 14.81, 20.3% females) placed in detention in Connecticut (January 1, 2010-July 1, 2011). All youth completed a computerized educational screener designed to test a range of performance in reading (word and text levels) and mathematics. A subsample (n = 410) received the "Wide Range Achievement Test," in addition to the educational screener. Quantitative (scale-based) and qualitative (grade-equivalence-based) indicators were then analyzed for both assessments. Results established the range of LD in this sample from 13% to 40%, averaging 24.9%. This work provides a systematic exploration of the type and severity of word and text reading and mathematics skill deficiencies among juvenile detainees and builds the foundation for subsequent efforts that may link these deficiencies to both more formal, structured, and variable definitions and classifications of LD, and to other types of disabilities (e.g., intellectual disability) and developmental disorders (e.g., ADHD) that need to be conducted in future research.
ISSN:0022-2194
DOI:10.1177/0022219413500991